From: qiaozhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Wang Wilbur <wilburwang@asrmicro.com>,
Wu Gang <gangwu@asrmicro.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Question] about patch: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:34:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8aca802-e681-8bc3-4ebc-e86cd9b7e2f4@asrmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160902142102.GG12660@htj.duckdns.org>
On 2016年09月02日 22:21, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:50:07AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:17:04AM +0800, qiaozhou wrote:
>>>>> I don't know whether it's meaningful to still check pending work here, or
>>>>> it's not suggested to use pm_qos_update_request in this early boot up phase.
>>>>> Could you help to share some opinions? (I can fix this issue by adding the
>>>>> current qos value directly instead of default value, though.)
>>>> Hmmm... but I suppose this is super-early in the boot. Would it make
>>>> sense to have a static variable (e.g. bool clk_fully_initailized) to
>>>> gate the cancel_delayed_sync() call?
>>> You're right that it's indeed super-early stage. But currently we can't
>>> control the gate of can_delayed_work_sync, since it's inside
>>> pm_qos_update_request. Out of our control. We can choose to not call
>>> pm_qos_update_request to avoid this issue, and use pm_qos_add_request
>>> alternatively. Good to have it.
>> Ah sorry, didn't understand that the offending cancel_sync call is in
>> the generic part. Hmm... but yeah, we should still be able to take
>> the same approach. I'll see what's the right thing to gate the
>> operation there.
> Does the following patch work?
The patch can fix this issue. Thanks a lot.
>
> Subject: power: avoid calling cancel_delayed_work_sync() during early boot
>
> of_clk_init() ends up calling into pm_qos_update_request() very early
> during boot where irq is expected to stay disabled.
> pm_qos_update_request() uses cancel_delayed_work_sync() which
> correctly assumes that irq is enabled on invocation and
> unconditionally disables and re-enables it.
>
> Gate cancel_delayed_work_sync() invocation with kevented_up() to avoid
> enabling irq unexpectedly during early boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Qiao Zhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d2501c4c-8e7b-bea3-1b01-000b36b5dfe9@asrmicro.com
> ---
> kernel/power/qos.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
> index 97b0df7..168ff44 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/qos.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,16 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
> return;
> }
>
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&req->work);
> + /*
> + * This function may be called very early during boot, for example,
> + * from of_clk_init(), where irq needs to stay disabled.
> + * cancel_delayed_work_sync() assumes that irq is enabled on
> + * invocation and re-enables it on return. Avoid calling it until
> + * workqueue is initialized.
> + */
> + if (keventd_up())
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&req->work);
> +
> __pm_qos_update_request(req, new_value);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-05 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-01 9:09 qiaozhou
2016-09-01 18:45 ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-02 1:17 ` qiaozhou
2016-09-02 13:50 ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-02 14:21 ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-03 15:27 ` qiaozhou
2016-09-05 5:34 ` qiaozhou [this message]
2016-09-05 12:38 ` [PATCH] power: avoid calling cancel_delayed_work_sync() during early boot Tejun Heo
2016-09-05 12:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-04 1:29 [Question] about patch: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() Andreas Mohr
2016-09-05 12:41 ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-05 14:14 ` Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8aca802-e681-8bc3-4ebc-e86cd9b7e2f4@asrmicro.com \
--to=qiaozhou@asrmicro.com \
--cc=gangwu@asrmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wilburwang@asrmicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®