mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] firmware: qcom: uefisecapp: add support for R/O UEFI vars
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 15:49:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cae5bfbe-9537-4b9d-b026-170063054b35@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aF1Hhs0JAS747SVi@hovoldconsulting.com>

On 6/26/25 3:13 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 02:15:26PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 04:13:34AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 04:50:27PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 04:45:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Also not sure how useful it is to only be able to read variables,
>>>>>> including for the RTC where you'll end up with an RTC that's always
>>>>>> slightly off due to drift (even if you can set it when booting into
>>>>>> Windows or possibly from the UEFI setup).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't you have any SDAM blocks in the PMICs that you can use instead for
>>>>>> a proper functioning RTC on these machines?
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather not poke into an SDAM, especially since we don't have docs
>>>> which SDAM blocks are used and which are not.
>>>
>>> You're with Qualcomm now so you should be able to dig up this
>>> information like we did for the X13s (even if I'm quite aware that it
>>> may still be easier said than done).
>>
>> I'd rather try to find information on how to update UEFI vars on the
>> storage.
> 
> You can do both, especially if it turns out you won't be able to have
> persistent variables on these machines.

The danger here is that we only know what Qualcomm uses these cells
for, not necessarily what the vendors with a similar idea could
have come up with.

This is especially important since (unfortunately without going into
detail), you *really* don't want to mess up some existing values in
there.

Konrad

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-21 19:56 [PATCH v2 0/4] firmware: qcom: enable UEFI variables on Lenovo Yoga C630 Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-21 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] firmware: qcom: scm: allow specifying quirks for QSEECOM implementations Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-23 10:33   ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-21 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] firmware: qcom: uefisecapp: add support for R/O UEFI vars Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-23 14:45   ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-23 14:49     ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-23 14:52       ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-23 14:52         ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-23 14:50     ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-24  1:13       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26  9:42         ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 11:15           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 13:13             ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 13:49               ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2025-06-26 14:07                 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 23:09               ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-27 12:16                 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-21 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] firmware: qcom: enable QSEECOM on Lenovo Yoga C630 Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-23 10:36   ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-21 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630: fix RTC offset info Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-23 10:36   ` Konrad Dybcio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cae5bfbe-9537-4b9d-b026-170063054b35@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®