Re: [RFCv1 4/4] perf: arm_spe: Dynamically switch PID tracing to contextidr

[James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>]

On 22/10/2021 16:36, James Clark wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21/10/2021 14:45, Leo Yan wrote:
>> Now Arm64 provides API for enabling and disable PID tracing, Arm SPE
>> driver invokes these functions to dynamically enable it during
>> profiling when the program runs in root PID name space, and disable PID
>> tracing when the perf event is stopped.
>>
>> Device drivers should not depend on CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR for PID
>> tracing, so this patch uses the consistent condition for setting bit
>> EL1_CX for PMSCR.
> 
> Hi Leo,
> 
> I've been testing this change, but I'm seeing something strange. Not sure
> if it's a problem on my side or not yet. With this command:
> 
>  sudo ./perf record -vvv -e arm_spe//u -- taskset --cpu-list 1 bash -c ls
> 
> I'm only seeing 0 values for context:
> 
>  sudo ./perf report -D | grep CONTEXT
> 
> .  00038dce:  65 00 00 00 00                                  CONTEXT 0x0 el2
> .  00038e0e:  65 00 00 00 00                                  CONTEXT 0x0 el2
> 
> I added a printk to the function, and I see it print non zero values, although
> there are some zero ones mixed in there too:
> 
>  diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 0c1669db19a1..8f0fb43a5fac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ static inline void contextidr_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>         if (!static_branch_unlikely(&contextidr_in_use))
>                 return;
>  
> -       write_sysreg(task_pid_nr(next), contextidr_el1);
> +       printk("Set %d\n", task_pid_nr(next));
> +       write_sysreg(task_pid_nr(next), contextidr_el2);

Ignore this second line change, that doesn't even compile. It's just the printk that I added.