From: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Linux MTD List <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Broadcom Kernel List <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, kursad.oney@broadcom.com,
joel.peshkin@broadcom.com, anand.gore@broadcom.com,
dregan@mail.com, kamal.dasu@broadcom.com,
tomer.yacoby@broadcom.com, dan.beygelman@broadcom.com,
David Regan <dregan@broadcom.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for getting ecc setting from strap
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:35:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc0e98e4-b92f-4da5-879d-7535e787b98f@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220105313.5e3c600d@xps-13>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6340 bytes --]
Hi Miquel,
On 2/20/24 01:53, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> william.zhang@broadcom.com wrote on Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:22:54 -0800:
>
>> BCMBCA broadband SoC based board design does not specify ecc setting in
>> dts but rather use the SoC NAND strap info to obtain the ecc strength
>> and spare area size setting. Add brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap dts propety for
>> this purpose and update driver to support this option.
>>
>> The generic nand ecc settings still take precedence over this flag. For
>> example, if nand-ecc-strength is set in the dts, the driver ignores the
>> strap setting and falls back to original behavior. This makes sure that
>> the existing BCMBCA board dts still works the old way even the strap
>> flag is set in the BCMBCA chip dtsi.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: David Regan <dregan@broadcom.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v5: None
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Update the comments for ecc setting selection
>>
>> Changes in v3: None
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Minor cosmetic fixes
>>
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> index 73fdf7ce21aa..efeee9e80213 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> @@ -1038,6 +1038,19 @@ static inline int brcmnand_sector_1k_shift(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +static int brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
>> + int shift = brcmnand_sector_1k_shift(ctrl);
>> + u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs,
>> + BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL);
>> +
>> + if (shift < 0)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return (nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs) >> shift) & 0x1;
>
> What is this & 0x1 ? If you return a yes/no value, please make this
> function return a bool. Also, please use intermediate steps to clarify
> what you do.
>
> sector_1k_bit = ...;
> acc = nand_readreg();
> return acc & BIT(sector_1k_bit);
>
> Or something like that.
>
This sector 1k bit is just single bit field. But we do want to return
negative for error condition and 0 for 512 sector and 1 for 1K sector
size. Will add intermediate steps.
>> +}
>> +
>> static void brcmnand_set_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host, int val)
>> {
>> struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
>> @@ -1055,6 +1068,38 @@ static void brcmnand_set_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host, int val)
>> nand_writereg(ctrl, acc_control_offs, tmp);
>> }
>>
>> +static int brcmnand_get_spare_size(struct brcmnand_host *host)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
>> + u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs,
>> + BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL);
>> + u32 acc = nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs);
>> +
>> + return (acc & brcmnand_spare_area_mask(ctrl));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmnand_get_ecc_strength(struct brcmnand_host *host)
>
> _from_strap
>
>> +{
>> + struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
>> + u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs,
>> + BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL);
>> + int sector_size_1k = brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(host);
>> + int spare_area_size, ecc_level, ecc_strength;
>> + u32 acc;
>> +
>> + spare_area_size = brcmnand_get_spare_size(host);
>> + acc = nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs);
>> + ecc_level = (acc & brcmnand_ecc_level_mask(ctrl)) >> ctrl->ecc_level_shift;
>
> Please use FIELD_PREP/FIELD_GET.
>
These macros do not work here as the mask is not constant.
>> + if (sector_size_1k)
>> + ecc_strength = ecc_level * 2;
>> + else if (spare_area_size == 16 && ecc_level == 15)
>> + ecc_strength = 1; /* hamming */
>> + else
>> + ecc_strength = ecc_level;
>> +
>> + return ecc_strength;
>> +}
>> +
>> /***********************************************************************
>> * CS_NAND_SELECT
>> ***********************************************************************/
>> @@ -2622,19 +2667,43 @@ static int brcmnand_setup_dev(struct brcmnand_host *host)
>> nanddev_get_memorg(&chip->base);
>> struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
>> struct brcmnand_cfg *cfg = &host->hwcfg;
>> - char msg[128];
>> + struct device_node *np = nand_get_flash_node(chip);
>> u32 offs, tmp, oob_sector;
>> - int ret;
>> + int ret, sector_size_1k = 0;
>> + bool use_strap = false;
>> + char msg[128];
>>
>> memset(cfg, 0, sizeof(*cfg));
>> + use_strap = of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap");
>>
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32(nand_get_flash_node(chip),
>> - "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
>> + /*
>> + * Set ECC size and strength based on hw configuration from strap
>> + * if brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap is set. However if nand-ecc-strength
>> + * is set, its value will be used and ignore the strap setting.
>
> Please error out in this case. It's one or the other, not both.
>
Will update.
>> + */
>> + if (chip->ecc.strength)
>> + use_strap = 0;
>> +
>> + if (use_strap) {
>> + chip->ecc.strength = brcmnand_get_ecc_strength(host);
>> + sector_size_1k = brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(host);
>> + if (chip->ecc.size == 0) {
>> + if (sector_size_1k < 0)
>> + chip->ecc.size = 512;
>> + else
>> + chip->ecc.size = 512 << sector_size_1k;
>> + }
>
> I'd instead make a function named brcmnand_get_ecc_settings() with the
> chip->ecc parameter, so you can directly fill the entries without
> getting another time the sector_size_1k thing.
>
> Strength and step size are tightly linked, it does make sense to derive
> them both at the same time.
>
Will update.
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
>> &oob_sector);
>> if (ret) {
>> - /* Use detected size */
>> - cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize /
>> - (mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT);
>> + if (use_strap)
>> + cfg->spare_area_size = brcmnand_get_spare_size(host);
>> + else
>> + /* Use detected size */
>> + cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize /
>> + (mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT);
>> } else {
>> cfg->spare_area_size = oob_sector;
>> }
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 20:22 [PATCH v5 00/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: driver and doc updates William Zhang
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] dt-bindings: mtd: brcmnand: Updates for bcmbca SoCs William Zhang
2024-02-22 0:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] dt-bindings: mtd: brcmnand: Add WP pin connection property William Zhang
2024-02-09 17:34 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-22 0:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] dt-bindings: mtd: brcmnand: Add ecc strap property William Zhang
2024-02-09 17:42 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-20 9:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] ARM: dts: broadcom: bcmbca: Add NAND controller node William Zhang
2024-02-22 0:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-22 7:01 ` William Zhang
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] arm64: " William Zhang
2024-02-22 8:27 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-22 16:21 ` William Zhang
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] arm64: dts: broadcom: bcmbca: Update router boards William Zhang
2024-02-22 0:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-22 0:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-22 7:02 ` William Zhang
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Rename bcm63138 nand driver William Zhang
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add BCMBCA read data bus interface William Zhang
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for getting ecc setting from strap William Zhang
2024-02-20 9:53 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-23 3:35 ` William Zhang [this message]
2024-02-20 9:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Support write protection setting from dts William Zhang
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: exec_op helper functions return type fixes William Zhang
2024-02-20 10:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-20 10:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-21 1:11 ` William Zhang
2024-02-21 6:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-02-21 8:32 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-21 16:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-07 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: update log level messages William Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc0e98e4-b92f-4da5-879d-7535e787b98f@broadcom.com \
--to=william.zhang@broadcom.com \
--cc=anand.gore@broadcom.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.beygelman@broadcom.com \
--cc=dregan@broadcom.com \
--cc=dregan@mail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=joel.peshkin@broadcom.com \
--cc=kamal.dasu@broadcom.com \
--cc=kursad.oney@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tomer.yacoby@broadcom.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®