From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <criu@lists.linux.dev>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] x86/fpu: Document reasoning of FX-only fallback
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:23:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc65271d-f582-420e-b8cc-86776d206cd7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615193716.1843340-5-avagin@google.com>
On 6/15/2026 12:37 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>
> This fallback is dangerous as it can trigger silent corruptions of
> user-space state by resetting extended registers if the process was
> using them but the frame metadata was malformed.
>
> XSAVE was introduced 15 years ago, we may need to consider removing this
> fallback entirely or introducing a sysctl to enable/disable it.
This reads more like a separate problem statement. I don't see any
follow-up implementing either option here.
Without additional context, it isn't entirely clear to me why this
should be in this changelog at least.
Thanks,
Chang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 19:37 [PATCH v3 0/10] x86/fpu: Restore and reinforce signal frame portability Andrei Vagin
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/fpu: Document " Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 13:51 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-30 19:23 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 02/10] x86/fpu: Clean up and rename variables in signal frame handling Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 17:05 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86/fpu: Split __fpu_restore_sig to extract compat path Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 17:20 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86/fpu: Document reasoning of FX-only fallback Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 14:22 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-30 19:23 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/fpu: Fix potential underflow in xstate_calculate_size() Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 14:32 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-30 19:23 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 06/10] selftests/x86: Add a test for signal frame FPU portability Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 14:39 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86/fpu: Pre-fault only required size of xstate buffer Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 17:28 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 08/10] selftests/x86: Add a sigframe insufficient xstate_size test Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 15:02 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86/fpu: Allow restoring signal frames with larger xstate_size Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 17:32 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2026-06-30 19:23 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-07-01 0:48 ` Andrei Vagin
2026-07-06 17:08 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-07-07 20:27 ` Andrei Vagin
2026-07-09 21:14 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-07-10 22:24 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-06-15 19:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] selftests/x86: Check restoring FPU state " Andrei Vagin
2026-06-26 15:12 ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc65271d-f582-420e-b8cc-86776d206cd7@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=avagin@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=criu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome