mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] define convenient securebits masks for prctl users (v2)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:42:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0911140042n265b95adve2121e143c21c8ad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0910300851470.25970@tundra.namei.org>

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:51 PM, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>> Hi James, would you mind taking the following into
>> security-testing?
>
>
> Applied to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next

It doesn't look like this change is in 2.6.32-rc7. Is it planned to
push this out for 2.6.32?

Cheers,

Michael

>> The securebits are used by passing them to prctl with the
>> PR_{S,G}ET_SECUREBITS commands.  But the defines must be
>> shifted to be used in prctl, which begs to be confused and
>> misused by userspace.  So define some more convenient
>> values for userspace to specify.  This way userspace does
>>
>>       prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, SECBIT_NOROOT);
>>
>> instead of
>>
>>       prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, 1 << SECURE_NOROOT);
>>
>> (Thanks to Michael for the idea)
>>
>> This patch also adds include/linux/securebits to the installed headers.
>> Then perhaps it can be included by glibc's sys/prctl.h.
>>
>> Changelog:
>>       Oct 29: Stephen Rothwell points out that issecure can
>>               be under __KERNEL__.
>>       Oct 14: (Suggestions by Michael Kerrisk):
>>               1. spell out SETUID in SECBIT_NO_SETUID*
>>               2. SECBIT_X_LOCKED does not imply SECBIT_X
>>               3. add definitions for keepcaps
>>         Oct 14: As suggested by Michael Kerrisk, don't
>>               use SB_* as that convention is already in
>>               use.  Use SECBIT_ prefix instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
>> Acked-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
>> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/Kbuild       |    1 +
>>  include/linux/securebits.h |   24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/Kbuild b/include/linux/Kbuild
>> index 1feed71..5a53857 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/Kbuild
>> +++ b/include/linux/Kbuild
>> @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ unifdef-y += scc.h
>>  unifdef-y += sched.h
>>  unifdef-y += screen_info.h
>>  unifdef-y += sdla.h
>> +unifdef-y += securebits.h
>>  unifdef-y += selinux_netlink.h
>>  unifdef-y += sem.h
>>  unifdef-y += serial_core.h
>> diff --git a/include/linux/securebits.h b/include/linux/securebits.h
>> index d2c5ed8..3340617 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/securebits.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/securebits.h
>> @@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
>>  #ifndef _LINUX_SECUREBITS_H
>>  #define _LINUX_SECUREBITS_H 1
>>
>> +/* Each securesetting is implemented using two bits. One bit specifies
>> +   whether the setting is on or off. The other bit specify whether the
>> +   setting is locked or not. A setting which is locked cannot be
>> +   changed from user-level. */
>> +#define issecure_mask(X)     (1 << (X))
>> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>> +#define issecure(X)          (issecure_mask(X) & current_cred_xxx(securebits))
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  #define SECUREBITS_DEFAULT 0x00000000
>>
>>  /* When set UID 0 has no special privileges. When unset, we support
>> @@ -12,6 +21,9 @@
>>  #define SECURE_NOROOT                        0
>>  #define SECURE_NOROOT_LOCKED         1  /* make bit-0 immutable */
>>
>> +#define SECBIT_NOROOT                (issecure_mask(SECURE_NOROOT))
>> +#define SECBIT_NOROOT_LOCKED (issecure_mask(SECURE_NOROOT_LOCKED))
>> +
>>  /* When set, setuid to/from uid 0 does not trigger capability-"fixup".
>>     When unset, to provide compatiblility with old programs relying on
>>     set*uid to gain/lose privilege, transitions to/from uid 0 cause
>> @@ -19,6 +31,10 @@
>>  #define SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP               2
>>  #define SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP_LOCKED        3  /* make bit-2 immutable */
>>
>> +#define SECBIT_NO_SETUID_FIXUP       (issecure_mask(SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP))
>> +#define SECBIT_NO_SETUID_FIXUP_LOCKED \
>> +                     (issecure_mask(SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP_LOCKED))
>> +
>>  /* When set, a process can retain its capabilities even after
>>     transitioning to a non-root user (the set-uid fixup suppressed by
>>     bit 2). Bit-4 is cleared when a process calls exec(); setting both
>> @@ -27,12 +43,8 @@
>>  #define SECURE_KEEP_CAPS             4
>>  #define SECURE_KEEP_CAPS_LOCKED              5  /* make bit-4 immutable */
>>
>> -/* Each securesetting is implemented using two bits. One bit specifies
>> -   whether the setting is on or off. The other bit specify whether the
>> -   setting is locked or not. A setting which is locked cannot be
>> -   changed from user-level. */
>> -#define issecure_mask(X)     (1 << (X))
>> -#define issecure(X)          (issecure_mask(X) & current_cred_xxx(securebits))
>> +#define SECBIT_KEEP_CAPS     (issecure_mask(SECURE_KEEP_CAPS))
>> +#define SECBIT_KEEP_CAPS_LOCKED (issecure_mask(SECURE_KEEP_CAPS_LOCKED))
>>
>>  #define SECURE_ALL_BITS              (issecure_mask(SECURE_NOROOT) | \
>>                                issecure_mask(SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP) | \
>> --
>> 1.6.1
>>
>
> --
> James Morris
> <jmorris@namei.org>
>



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface" http://blog.man7.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-14  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-29 16:40 Serge E. Hallyn
2009-10-29 21:51 ` James Morris
2009-11-14  8:42   ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2009-11-15 21:09     ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cfd18e0f0911140042n265b95adve2121e143c21c8ad@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morgan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®