From: "Daniel Spång" <daniel.spang@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Out of memory management in embedded systems
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:55:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfd9edbf0709280555n51afa8aft5040331ae9c227fd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Applications with dynamic input and dynamic memory usage have some
issues with the current overcommitting kernel. A high memory usage
situation eventually results in that a process is killed by the OOM
killer. This is especially evident in swapless embedded systems with
limited memory and no swap available.
Some kind of notification to the application that the available memory
is scarce and let the application free up some memory (e.g., by
flushing caches), could be used to improve the situation and avoid the
OOM killer. I am currently not aware of any general solution to this
problem, but I have found some approaches that might (or might not)
work:
o Turn off overcommit. Results in a waste of memory.
o Nokia uses a lowmem security module to signal on predetermined
thresholds. Currently available in the -omap tree. But this requires
manual tuning of the thresholds.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8502
o Using madvise() with MADV_FREE to get the kernel to free mmaped
memory, typically application caches, when the kernel needs the
memory.
o A OOM handler that the application registers with the kernel, and
that the kernel executes before the OOM-killer steps in.
Does it exist any other solutions to this problem?
Daniel
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-28 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-28 12:55 Daniel Spång [this message]
2007-09-28 13:09 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-09-28 13:30 ` Daniel Spång
2007-09-28 14:04 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-09-28 14:14 ` Daniel Spång
2007-09-28 15:16 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-09-28 20:58 ` Daniel Spång
2007-09-29 19:48 ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-09-28 14:17 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-28 14:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-09-28 15:15 ` Rik van Riel
2007-09-28 23:00 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-09-29 1:59 ` Daniel Phillips
[not found] <98nC1-6aM-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <98nVg-6QQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <98oeB-7gA-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <98oHC-8ai-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <98oRk-8mt-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <98pNu-1pp-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-09-29 9:15 ` Bodo Eggert
[not found] ` <98v6u-1h1-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <98Qu9-170-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-10-01 7:58 ` Markku Savela
2007-10-01 8:13 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2007-10-01 16:27 ` david
2007-10-01 20:25 ` Robin Getz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cfd9edbf0709280555n51afa8aft5040331ae9c227fd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.spang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome