Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] w1: Add subsystem kernel public interface

["Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>]

On 05/26/2017 11:13 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> 
> 
> 25.05.2017, 16:50, "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>:
> 
>>>  Why do you have to create a pseudo-platform device driver to connect w1 and power/supply?
>>>
>>>  I'm not against creating w1 drivers in different places than drivers/w1, but so far
>>>  it was only power drivers which have problem with it (and they easily work it out),
>>>  and this rises a flag.
>>
>> We could keep it in w1 if we really wanted, but then things like Kconfig
>> will get difficult to manage (we will jump between menus and have odd
>> dependencies).
> 
> One still has to jump between kconfig menus to enable w1 and power devices,
> or to use 'select', nothing really changes.
> 

Well, one less step in that we get to drop the platform shim driver, but
I see what you mean.

>> The other w1/slaves seem to mostly be simple EEPROMs and Gauges that
>> would otherwise end up in misc/ so it is fine if they live in w1, but
>> BQ27xxx does have a proper home in power/supplies and its i2c interface
>> is already there, so moving the w1 interface there also makes sense to me.
>>
>>>  I would rather move w1 header into include/linux, will it be enough?
>>
>> That's what this patch does, we just also re-organize things a bit so
>> only things that need to be public end up in include/linux. It seems to
>> be all that is needed for my use-case at least.
> 
> Ok, lets merge it.

Great, thanks!

> 
> My personal note: please drop TI copyright from headers, at least from those which already exist
> and you move them around, it is your work and not TI. It is up to you to put into driver itself.
> 

9-5 TI owns everything I touch :) so I just figured I should add it, but
I have no personal problem dropping the copyright notice (actually I
already did this as you requested this in v1).