From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Tim Connors <tconnors+linuxkernel1090893567@astro.swin.edu.au>
Cc: Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Joel.Becker@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Autotune swappiness01
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:43:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cone.1090896213.276247.20693.502@pc.kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrn-0.9.7.4-15175-21673-200407271159-tc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au>
Tim Connors writes:
> Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp> said on Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:17:16 +0900:
>>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> | Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>> |>
>> |>I changed that to 20 now, but I don't know if this will make things
>> |>worse or better.
>> |
>> | It may appear to be better, but you now have 100, maybe 200 megabytes less
>> | pagecache available across the entire working day.
>>
>> which might slow down overall working speed? or responsness of programs?
>
> Depends on what you do. Do you compile kernels regularly? In
> particular, do you have to wait for them, or do you just let them sit
> in the background, and come back to them when you rememeber, since
> you've been busy doing real work for the past 5 hours? If you wait,
> then I guess you want high swapiness.
Well I'm tired of this discussion which comes up every month or so and I
brought it up! Clearly my patch is not considered adequate so I promise
never to bring it up again.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-26 0:25 [PATCH][2.6.8-rc1-mm1] " Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 0:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 1:01 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 1:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 8:52 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 9:31 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:34 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 10:29 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:54 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 11:03 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 11:17 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 13:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 18:45 ` Adam Kropelin
2004-07-26 18:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 17:55 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-07-26 20:29 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-26 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 22:58 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27 0:52 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 1:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 1:17 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 2:03 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 2:43 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-07-27 3:02 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 3:43 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 3:47 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-27 15:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-27 3:41 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-26 14:52 Martin Knoblauch
2004-07-26 21:29 DaMouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cone.1090896213.276247.20693.502@pc.kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cs@tequila.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tconnors+linuxkernel1090893567@astro.swin.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®