mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@st.com>
To: radek <radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [1/2] ARM: irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:55:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d007f880-0509-e30c-4c28-94117d2f8037@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519221027-4028-2-git-send-email-radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com>

Hi Radek

I've tested your change on stm32h743i-eval.dts board
and gpio-keys tests are not functional.
No interrupt occurs when we push or release button
(cat /proc/interrupt).

Board: stm32h743i-eval.dts
Test description: gpio-keys (gpioc 13 => exti 13), with gpio or 
interrupt property.

comment below

On 02/21/2018 02:50 PM, radek wrote:
> - allocates generic chip with handle_simple_irq
> 	which simplifies irq_domain_ops.alloc callback
> 	- removes ack register from generic chip which is not used for
> 	handle_simple_irq as acking is done in a chained handler
> 	- removes unneeded irq_domain_ops.xlate callback
> 
> Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Pietrzyk <radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 10 +---------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> index 36f0fbe..42e74e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> @@ -176,16 +176,12 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>   static int stm32_exti_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>   			    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
>   {
> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>   	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
>   	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
>   
>   	hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> -	gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, hwirq);
>   
>   	irq_map_generic_chip(d, virq, hwirq);
> -	irq_domain_set_info(d, virq, hwirq, &gc->chip_types->chip, gc,
> -			    handle_simple_irq, NULL, NULL);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -200,7 +196,6 @@ static void stm32_exti_free(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>   
>   struct irq_domain_ops irq_exti_domain_ops = {
>   	.map	= irq_map_generic_chip,
> -	.xlate	= irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell,
>   	.alloc  = stm32_exti_alloc,
>   	.free	= stm32_exti_free,
>   };
> @@ -231,7 +226,7 @@ __init stm32_exti_init(const struct stm32_exti_bank **stm32_exti_banks,
>   	}
>   
>   	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, IRQS_PER_BANK, 1, "exti",
> -					     handle_edge_irq, clr, 0, 0);
> +					     handle_simple_irq, clr, 0, 0);

EXTI hardware block is trigged on pulse event rising or failing edge.
Why do you change to handle_simple_irq ?

>   	if (ret) {
>   		pr_err("%pOF: Could not allocate generic interrupt chip.\n",
>   			node);
> @@ -246,13 +241,10 @@ __init stm32_exti_init(const struct stm32_exti_bank **stm32_exti_banks,
>   
>   		gc->reg_base = base;
>   		gc->chip_types->type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
> -		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
>   		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
>   		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>   		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type = stm32_irq_set_type;
>   		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake = stm32_irq_set_wake;
> -		gc->chip_types->regs.ack = stm32_bank->pr_ofst;
> -		gc->chip_types->regs.mask = stm32_bank->imr_ofst;
>   		gc->private = (void *)stm32_bank;
>   
>   		/* Determine number of irqs supported */
> 

BR
Ludo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-21 13:50 [PATCH 0/2] Optimizes, cleans up and enhances stm32-exti irq hierarchy Radoslaw Pietrzyk
2018-02-21 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain Radoslaw Pietrzyk
2018-02-22 10:55   ` Ludovic BARRE [this message]
2018-02-22 11:01     ` [1/2] " Radosław Pietrzyk
2018-02-23  8:34       ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2018-02-21 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: pinctrl: stm32: Optimizes and enhances stm32gpio irqchip Radoslaw Pietrzyk
2018-02-21 15:11   ` Alexandre Torgue
2018-02-21 15:12   ` Alexandre Torgue
2018-03-01 21:04   ` Linus Walleij
2018-03-01 21:24     ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2018-03-02  8:14       ` Alexandre Torgue
2018-03-02  8:37         ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2018-03-02  8:49           ` Alexandre Torgue
2018-02-23  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] v2 patches for stm32-exti irq hierarchy Radoslaw Pietrzyk
2018-02-23  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain Radoslaw Pietrzyk
2018-02-23  8:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-23  9:05     ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2018-03-14 11:09     ` Marc Zyngier
     [not found]       ` <CAFvLkMSZjgFMAe0VRc0AEpG89BgXkfMb9+ivJ8V+PFighOoDRA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-03-14 12:04         ` Marc Zyngier
2018-04-19 13:24           ` Ludovic BARRE
     [not found]             ` <CAFvLkMQv3AajhFaRxsBt+UzdGFeix_FA-0mhtYqwMo2x0zgrnA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-04-20  7:18               ` Ludovic BARRE
2018-02-23 15:46   ` Ludovic BARRE
2018-02-23 16:16     ` Ludovic BARRE
2018-02-23 17:37     ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2018-02-26 15:23       ` Ludovic BARRE
2018-02-23  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: stm32: Optimizes and enhances stm32gpio irqchip Radoslaw Pietrzyk
2018-02-26 15:25   ` Ludovic BARRE
2018-03-01 22:41   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d007f880-0509-e30c-4c28-94117d2f8037@st.com \
    --to=ludovic.barre@st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®