From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to redirty page if fail to gc data page
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:13:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0222ec2-986a-9d73-d3f5-c98335c0f37a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160603050858.GA24882@jaegeuk>
On 2016/6/3 13:08, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 02:10:50PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2016/5/30 10:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 01:19:11PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> If we fail to move data page during foreground GC, we should give another
>>>> chance to writeback that page which was set dirty previously by writer.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 5 ++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>> index 38d56f6..ee213a8 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>> @@ -653,12 +653,15 @@ static void move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type)
>>>> .page = page,
>>>> .encrypted_page = NULL,
>>>> };
>>>> + bool is_dirty = PageDirty(page);
>>>> +
>>>> set_page_dirty(page);
>>>> f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, DATA, true);
>>>> if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
>>>> inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
>>>> set_cold_data(page);
>>>> - do_write_data_page(&fio);
>>>> + if (do_write_data_page(&fio) && is_dirty)
>>>> + set_page_dirty(page);
>>>
>>> If this page is truncated with -ENOENT, we don't need to set it dirty again.
>>
>> Agree
>>
>>> I expect that, if we get an error here, do_garbage_collect() would retry FG_GC
>>
>> IIRC, you have reworked the FG_GC flows changed from an infinite loop to trying
>> do the movement just one time. Here, I think if there are just few of blocks are
>> failed to be moved, we can give one more time for retrying. How do you think?
>
> Mostly I expected here -ENOENT caused by race condition.
If we hit ENOENT case, we can pass get_valid_blocks check, so we don't need to
worry about this case, right?
> Do we have another expectation?
ENOMEM or EIO?
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>>> again.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>> clear_cold_data(page);
>>>> }
>>>> out:
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.2
>>> .
>>>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-03 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-21 5:19 Chao Yu
2016-05-28 0:54 ` Chao Yu
2016-05-30 2:37 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-05-31 6:10 ` Chao Yu
2016-06-03 5:08 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 5:13 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2016-06-03 5:17 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 5:59 ` Chao Yu
2016-06-03 17:36 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0222ec2-986a-9d73-d3f5-c98335c0f37a@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®