From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen/pci: do not register devices outside of PCI segment scope
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:20:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d055ed99-8b27-4ff3-af6e-fe66d2f01708@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250110222129.GA317771@bhelgaas>
On 10.01.2025 23:21, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 03:01:48PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> The PCI segment value is limited to 16 bits, however there are buses like VMD
>> that fake being part of the PCI topology by adding segment with a number
>> outside the scope of the PCI firmware specification range (>= 0x10000). The
>> MCFG ACPI Table "PCI Segment Group Number" field is defined as having a 16 bit
>> width.
>>
>> Attempting to register or manage those devices with Xen would result in errors
>> at best, or overlaps with existing devices living on the truncated equivalent
>> segment values.
>
> The ACPI _SEG method (ACPI r6.5, sec 6.5.6) and the corresponding
> value in the MCFG table (PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2) are clearly
> 16-bit values.
>
> But otherwise, the segment value is pretty much an arbitrary software
> value, and the kernel works fine with the larger domain values from
> vmd_find_free_domain(), so this isn't quite enough to explain what the
> issue with Xen is.
>
> Does Xen truncate the domain to 16 bits or use it to look up something
> in ACPI?
One of the involved public interface structs starts like this:
struct physdev_pci_device_add {
/* IN */
uint16_t seg;
uint8_t bus;
uint8_t devfn;
...
So yes, wider segment values would be truncated. Plus, even if they weren't,
there would need to be coordination between Dom0 and Xen on which devices
gets which segment number, since - as you say - the assignment in Linux is
pretty much arbitrary.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 14:01 [PATCH 0/3] xen: fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge Roger Pau Monne
2025-01-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen/pci: do not register devices outside of PCI segment scope Roger Pau Monne
2025-01-10 22:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-13 7:20 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2025-01-13 10:18 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-01-13 23:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-13 7:17 ` Jan Beulich
2025-01-13 10:13 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-01-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] vmd: disable MSI remapping bypass under Xen Roger Pau Monne
2025-01-10 22:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-11 5:02 ` Jonathan Derrick
2025-01-13 10:07 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-01-13 10:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-01-13 15:11 ` Keith Busch
2025-01-13 16:45 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-01-13 16:53 ` Keith Busch
2025-01-14 11:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-01-12 2:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] pci/msi: remove pci_msi_ignore_mask Roger Pau Monne
2025-01-10 22:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-13 10:25 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-01-13 23:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-11 11:08 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-11 12:24 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d055ed99-8b27-4ff3-af6e-fe66d2f01708@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome