From: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@gmail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Correct the polarity logic within
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:41:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1183441-ee4e-4700-90d9-996769eaaa11@ixit.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-dramatic-ocelot-of-support-2aa377@quoll>
On 29/09/2026 09:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 04:01:34PM +0200, David Heidelberg wrote:
>> The reset was introduced with wrong polarity. Correct for the future
>> compatibles and keep current with reverted logic.
>>
>> Old DTs keep GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and are fixed up via
>> gpiod_toggle_active_low() on the deprecated compatible.
>>
>> Assisted-by: LLM
>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6e3ha8.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6e3ha8.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6e3ha8.c
>> index 5e1e997b83b36..99290913de69a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6e3ha8.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6e3ha8.c
>> @@ -20,16 +20,17 @@
>> #include "panel-samsung-dsi.h"
>>
>> struct s6e3ha8_desc {
>> const struct drm_panel_funcs *funcs;
>> const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
>> unsigned long mode_flags;
>> const struct regulator_bulk_data *supplies;
>> unsigned int num_supplies;
>> + bool broken_reset_polarity;
>> };
>>
>> struct s6e3ha8 {
>> struct drm_panel panel;
>> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
>> const struct s6e3ha8_desc *desc;
>> struct drm_dsc_config dsc;
>> struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
>> @@ -62,22 +63,22 @@ static int s6e3ha8_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>> {
>> struct s6e3ha8 *priv = to_s6e3ha8(panel);
>>
>> return regulator_bulk_disable(priv->desc->num_supplies, priv->supplies);
>> }
>>
>> static void s6e3ha8_amb577px01_wqhd_reset(struct s6e3ha8 *priv)
>> {
>> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 1);
>> - usleep_range(5000, 6000);
>> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 0);
>> usleep_range(5000, 6000);
>> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 1);
>> usleep_range(5000, 6000);
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 0);
>
> This breaks all users and this usage of ABI was already released.
See the gpiod_toggle_active_low() usage later in the patch which keep the logic
for the original compatible as intended.
David
...
+ if (priv->desc->broken_reset_polarity)
+ gpiod_toggle_active_low(priv->reset_gpio);
+
>
> NAK
>
>> + usleep_range(5000, 6000);
>> }
>>
>> static int s6e3ha8_amb577px01_wqhd_on(struct s6e3ha8 *priv)
>> {
>> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = priv->dsi;
>> struct mipi_dsi_multi_context ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>>
>> dsi->mode_flags |= MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
>> @@ -203,17 +204,17 @@ static int s6e3ha8_amb577px01_wqhd_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>> ret = regulator_bulk_enable(priv->desc->num_supplies, priv->supplies);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>> mipi_dsi_msleep(&ctx, 120);
>> s6e3ha8_amb577px01_wqhd_reset(priv);
>>
>> ret = s6e3ha8_amb577px01_wqhd_on(priv);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 0);
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 1);
>
> No, you just changed it!
>
> Implement correct and logical fixes, not half-baked fix which is
> immediately wrong.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 14:01 [PATCH v2 00/11] Pixel 3 XL display panel support David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: display: panel: s6e3ha8: Adjust to reflect the DDIC and panel used David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: display: panel: samsung,s6e3ha8: Add AMB630QY01 panel David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Really assert reset on the failure David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 20:00 ` Petr Vorel
2026-09-29 7:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Introduce AMB577PX01 panel compatible David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Prepare for supporting multiple panels David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Correct the polarity logic within David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 9:41 ` David Heidelberg [this message]
2026-09-29 9:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 9:59 ` David Heidelberg
2026-09-29 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 12:12 ` David Heidelberg
2026-09-29 12:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Assert reset GPIO in unprepare David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: add Samsung AMB630QY01 (Google Pixel 3 XL) panel David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-samsung-starqltechn: Update panel compatible David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-google: Move panel pins into common David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-google-crosshatch: Add display panel David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1183441-ee4e-4700-90d9-996769eaaa11@ixit.cz \
--to=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dsankouski@gmail.com \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=petr.vorel@gmail.com \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®