From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Cc: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@gmail.com>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Correct the polarity logic within
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb8ace3d-3cea-4515-a0ba-bc4af3690c10@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49805bcc-2456-4f7d-a08a-3ccb7223ea50@ixit.cz>
On 29/09/2026 14:12, David Heidelberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> OK, I went way too fast, that's correct part. But splitting fix is still
>>>> just confusing. Backporting to stable is a different thing than fixing
>>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Sure, I already droped the previous commit changing it for stable.
>>>
>>> Btw. looking at gpiod_toggle_active_low(), would it make sense to do a series
>>> correcting panel reset logic? I see many panels keep "reset asserted" in the
>>> driver (but ofc not in the reality).
>>
>>
>> To my knowledge it is impossible task to do, without breaking something.
>
> I would do the partial change (only driver, not full DT).
>
> So we end up with drivers having the correct logic with extra 2-line DT quirk
> using gpiod_toggle_active_low() for given compatible.
>
> This could solve people implementing new panel on top of existing DDIC and allow
> them to use the right polarity for new compatible.
New compatibles you can change to the proper polarity - I do not object
this at all. I am referencing only existing DTS and existing bindings,
which you cannot change without having some sort of impact.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 14:01 [PATCH v2 00/11] Pixel 3 XL display panel support David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: display: panel: s6e3ha8: Adjust to reflect the DDIC and panel used David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: display: panel: samsung,s6e3ha8: Add AMB630QY01 panel David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Really assert reset on the failure David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 20:00 ` Petr Vorel
2026-09-29 7:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Introduce AMB577PX01 panel compatible David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Prepare for supporting multiple panels David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Correct the polarity logic within David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 9:41 ` David Heidelberg
2026-09-29 9:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 9:59 ` David Heidelberg
2026-09-29 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 12:12 ` David Heidelberg
2026-09-29 12:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: Assert reset GPIO in unprepare David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/panel: s6e3ha8: add Samsung AMB630QY01 (Google Pixel 3 XL) panel David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-samsung-starqltechn: Update panel compatible David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 7:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-google: Move panel pins into common David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-09-24 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-google-crosshatch: Add display panel David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb8ace3d-3cea-4515-a0ba-bc4af3690c10@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dsankouski@gmail.com \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=petr.vorel@gmail.com \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®