mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for review] [12/48] x86_64: use the global PIT lock
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:50:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d120d5000707200550q47148983w6b525f95fe67cd1f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707201025.12915.ak@suse.de>

On 7/20/07, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(i8253_lock);
> > +
> > static __init int add_pcspkr(void)
> > {
> > struct platform_device *pd;
> > @@ -1501,9 +1503,14 @@ static __init int add_pcspkr(void)
> > if (!pd)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > +pd->dev.platform_data = &i8253_lock;
>
> That seems pretty ugly to pass spinlocks around in void * pointers.

That spinlock _is_ platform data. We could define

struct pcspkr_platform_data {
        spinlock_t *lock;
};

and pass around this as the rest of platform code does but then we'd
need a header file and it would add a level of indirection but if you
like this better I can change it. Otherwise spinlock is another data
structure and we pass them around all teh time.

> Also
> out of general memory bloat reasons i don't like allocating big data structures
> just for this.
>

I am not sure where you see new data structure allocation... If you
look at your box you should see that /sys/bus/platform/devices/pcspkr
device is already there. We already create it so that pcspkr driver
can bind to it.

> Wouldn't  it be better to just define i8253_lock weakly in the pcspkr code and let
> the architecture override it?

Yes, it probably is btetter.

>
> > Index: work/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- work.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
> > +++ work/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> > #include <linux/sysdev.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/bcd.h>
> > #include <linux/notifier.h>
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > @@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ void main_timer_handler(void)
> > set_rtc_mmss(xtime.tv_sec);
> > rtc_update = xtime.tv_sec + 660;
> > }
> > -
> > +
> > write_sequnlock(&xtime_lock);
> > }
>
> No random white space changes in patches, multiple occurrences ?!?
>

By bad, sorry.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-20 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-19 13:48 [PATCH for review] [0/48] Second batch of x86 patches for .23 Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [1/48] i386: pgd_{c,d}tor() static Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [2/48] i386: fix section mismatch warning in intel_cacheinfo Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [3/48] i386: do not restore reserved memory after hibernation Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [4/48] i386: DMI_MATCH patch in reboot.c for SFF Dell OptiPlex 745 - fixes hang on reboot Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [5/48] i386: HPET, check if the counter works Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [6/48] x86: trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [7/48] i386: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 14:46   ` Dave Jones
2007-07-19 17:06     ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 14:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-20  0:45     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [8/48] i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace() Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [9/48] i386: move the kernel to 16MB for NUMA-Q Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [10/48] x86_64: Move functions declarations to header file Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [11/48] x86_64: During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 14:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-19 14:14     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-07-19 15:03       ` Will Schmidt
2007-07-23 18:09       ` [PATCH respin, was PATCH for review] " Will Schmidt
2007-07-23 21:16         ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-24 14:28           ` Will Schmidt
2007-07-24 14:31             ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-31  9:31         ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 14:55           ` Will Schmidt
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [12/48] x86_64: use the global PIT lock Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 15:22   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-07-19 17:29     ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 19:23       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-07-19 19:52         ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-20  4:24           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-07-20  8:25             ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 12:50               ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [13/48] x86_64: fix typo in acpi_pm.c Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [14/48] x86_64: lower printk severity Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [15/48] x86_64: fix wrong comment regarding set_fixmap() Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [16/48] x86_64: Geode HW Random Number Generator depends on X86_32 Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [17/48] x86_64: change _map_single to static in pci_gart.c etc Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [18/48] x86_64: flush_tlb_kernel_range() warning fix Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [19/48] i386: add cpu_relax() to cmos_lock() Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [20/48] i386: replace hard-coded constant with appropriate macro from kernel.h Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [21/48] x86_64: disable the GART in shutdown Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [22/48] x86_64: fix e820_hole_size based on address ranges Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [23/48] x86_64: disable srat when numa emulation succeeds Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [24/48] x86_64: move iommu declaration from proto to iommu.h Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [25/48] i386: remove volatile in apic.c Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [26/48] i386: hpet assumes boot cpu is 0 Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 16:23   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [27/48] i386: move PIT function declarations and constants to correct header file Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [28/48] i386: fix iounmap's use of vm_struct's size field Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:48 ` [PATCH for review] [29/48] x86_64: arch/x86_64/kernel/aperture.c lower printk severity Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [30/48] x86_64: arch/x86_64/kernel/e820.c " Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [31/48] i386: basic infrastructure support for AMD geode-class machines Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [32/48] i386: insert HPET firmware resource after PCI enumeration has completed Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [33/48] i386: remove old IRQ balancing debug cruft Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [34/48] i386: Update alignment when 4K stacks are used Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [35/48] x86_64: remove __smp_alt* sections Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [36/48] x86_64: k8topology add family 10h and 11h PCI IDs Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [37/48] x86_64: make k8topology multi-core aware Andi Kleen
2007-07-19 13:49 ` [PATCH for review] [38/48] x86_64: Put allocated ELF notes in read-only data segment Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d120d5000707200550q47148983w6b525f95fe67cd1f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®