From: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] r8152: Fix broken RX checksums.
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:19:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d261ef1c-b6d1-18a9-572a-2cf6978ff259@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB20104A0FD@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
On 16-11-09 08:09 AM, Hayes Wang wrote:
> Mark Lord [mailto:mlord@pobox.com]
..
>> The MTU/MRU on this link is the standard 1500 bytes, so a pkt_len of 2045 isn't
>> valid here.
>> And the rx_desc values look an awful lot like the rx_data values that follow it.
>>
>> There's definitely more broken here than just TCP RX checksums.
>
> I don't think it is the issue of our hw. If it happens, windows or
> other OS may have problems, too. It is like the memory issue described
> in commit 990c9b347245("Merge branch 'r8152-fixes'"). It seems that
> the data in memory is not same with the one from the device.
I am still doing long-term testing of various tweaks to the driver,
and can now confirm that changing from kmalloc() to usb_alloc_coherent()
vastly improves reliability, and re-enabling RX checksums works fine
with that change.
However, even with coherent URB buffers, I still see the occasional bad rx_desc:
like, twice in 36 hours of continuous bashing at it.
So having code in the driver to sanitize the rx_desc is essential.
My current test code (shared with Hayes already) includes validation of various
key fields of the rx_desc, and detects when the chip/driver/whatever gets confused.
Hopefully r8152.c will get updated to take more care before trusting
what it sees in the rx_desc fields.
Cheers
--
Mark Lord
mlord@pobox.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-09 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 22:36 [PATCH] drivers/net/usb/r8152 fix broken rx checksums Mark Lord
2016-10-26 22:54 ` Mark Lord
2016-10-30 21:22 ` David Miller
2016-10-30 23:48 ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-30 23:28 ` [PATCH net] r8152: Fix broken RX checksums Mark Lord
2016-10-31 0:57 ` David Miller
2016-10-31 2:07 ` Mark Lord
2016-10-31 3:53 ` David Miller
2016-10-31 8:14 ` Hayes Wang
2016-10-31 13:24 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-02 18:29 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-04 12:13 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <201611030159.uA31x0np004648@rtits1.realtek.com>
2016-11-03 8:56 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-03 11:43 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-04 13:50 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-04 20:13 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <201611041425.uA4EPwCw018176@rtits1.realtek.com>
2016-11-09 13:09 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-09 13:19 ` Mark Lord [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d261ef1c-b6d1-18a9-572a-2cf6978ff259@pobox.com \
--to=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hayeswang@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®