mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/mmcid: fix OOB clear_bit when CID is MM_CID_UNSET in fixup path
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:09:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d307ca42-b45c-421a-aa85-9de2ec4755e6@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616145343.1491887-1-riel@surriel.com>

On 2026-06-16 10:53, Rik van Riel wrote:
> In mm_cid_fixup_cpus_to_tasks(), when rq->curr has the target mm and
> mm_cid.active is set, the CID is checked with cid_in_transit() before
> setting the transition bit.  In per-CPU mode a newly forked or exec'd
> task can be running with mm_cid.cid == MM_CID_UNSET because CIDs are
> assigned lazily on schedule-in.  With cid_in_transit() the guard passes
> for MM_CID_UNSET (no transit bit), converts it to MM_CID_UNSET |
> MM_CID_TRANSIT and stores it back; later mm_cid_schedout() feeds this
> to clear_bit() with MM_CID_UNSET as the bit number, triggering an
> out-of-bounds write.
> 
> Symptoms: this is genuine memory corruption, but a bounded out-of-bounds
> write, not an arbitrary one.  MM_CID_UNSET is the fixed sentinel BIT(31),
> so once the bad value reaches mm_cid_schedout() the cid_from_transit_cid()
> strip leaves MM_CID_UNSET, which fails the "cid < max_cids" convergence
> test and falls into mm_drop_cid() -> clear_bit(MM_CID_UNSET,
> mm_cidmask(mm)).  The cid bitmap is embedded in the mm_struct slab object
> (after cpu_bitmap and mm_cpus_allowed) and is only num_possible_cpus()
> bits wide, so clearing bit 31 is a deterministic OOB bit-clear at a
> fixed offset of 2^31 / 8 == 256 MiB past the bitmap base.  The address is
> not attacker-influenced (fixed sentinel -> fixed offset) and the op only
> clears a single bit; what sits 256 MiB further along the direct map is
> whatever kernel object happens to live there, so this corrupts one bit of
> unpredictable kernel memory -- it is not an arbitrary-address or
> arbitrary-value write.
> 
> It triggers only in per-CPU CID mode, when a CPU is running an active
> task of the target mm whose cid is still MM_CID_UNSET -- the
> fork()/execve() window before that task's next schedule-in assigns it a
> real CID -- and a per-CPU -> per-task fixup walks over it (the mode
> fallback driven by a thread exit, sched_mm_cid_exit(), or by the deferred
> max_cids recompute in mm_cid_work_fn()).
> 
> In practice syzkaller surfaced it as a KASAN use-after-free reported in
> __schedule -> mm_cid_switch_to, where the offending clear_bit() is inlined
> via mm_cid_schedout() -> mm_drop_cid().
> 
> Switch to cid_on_task() which excludes MM_CID_UNSET, MM_CID_ONCPU, and
> MM_CID_TRANSIT, so we only set the transition bit on a genuine
> task-owned CID.
[...]
> ---
>   kernel/sched/core.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 8b791e9e9f67..4c8b6ca254ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -10909,8 +10909,19 @@ static void mm_cid_fixup_cpus_to_tasks(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   		} else if (rq->curr->mm == mm && rq->curr->mm_cid.active) {
>   			unsigned int cid = rq->curr->mm_cid.cid;
>   
> -			/* Ensure it has the transition bit set */
> -			if (!cid_in_transit(cid)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Only a genuine task-owned CID needs the transition
> +			 * bit. A running active task can legitimately have
> +			 * MM_CID_UNSET here: in per-CPU mode CIDs are assigned
> +			 * lazily on schedule-in, so fork()/execve() leave the
> +			 * task active with no owned CID until its next
> +			 * schedule-in. cid_on_task() excludes the
> +			 * MM_CID_UNSET/ONCPU/TRANSIT bits, so we never turn
> +			 * e.g. MM_CID_UNSET into MM_CID_UNSET|MM_CID_TRANSIT,
> +			 * which mm_cid_schedout() would later feed to
> +			 * clear_bit() as an out-of-bounds bit number.
> +			 */
> +			if (cid_on_task(cid)) {

I agree that something is wrong with the "unset" bit handling here, but
I'm not sure I fully understand why we would gate the
"fixup_cpus_to_tasks" on "cid_on_task()".

AFAIU there are the following relevant states:

- cid_on_task: True if none of the MM_CID_ONCPU, MM_CID_TRANSIT, MM_CID_UNSET bits is set

- MM_CID_TRANSIT: what this fixup aims to set if not already set.

- MM_CID_UNSET: tag indicating that the mm_cid is unset. This triggers the issue here
   because the "!cid_in_transit(cid)" check does not cover it.

- MM_CID_ONCPU: tag indicating that the cid is on cpu. Technically the "origin"
   state we are trying to transition from.

The cid_on_task() check will eliminate the "unset" case, but will also eliminate
the "oncpu" case, which I suspect is the initial state we want to transition from.

Did you try changing this to the following (completely untested) check instead:

   if (!cid_in_transit(cid) && !(cid & MM_CID_UNSET)) { ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

>   				cid = cid_to_transit_cid(cid);
>   				rq->curr->mm_cid.cid = cid;
>   				pcp->cid = cid;


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-16 14:53 Rik van Riel
2026-06-16 16:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2026-06-16 19:38   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-06-16 19:56 Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d307ca42-b45c-421a-aa85-9de2ec4755e6@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome