mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@canonical.com>,
	"Dwaipayan Ray" <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>,
	"Lukas Bulwahn" <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	"David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 03/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use cleanup.h
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:15:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3ca8db7c045909c9fff6bc3e96a7b8de1b05f8d.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8fe01b6d8c558f11fe51f9da5fbfea6708766096.camel@perches.com>

On Fri, 2023-10-13 at 11:14 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-10-13 at 13:39 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I added checkpatch people, please check what looks a false positive below.
> 
> Yeah, thanks I guess.
> The __free uses are very new.
> I'll play around with adding it to $Attributes
> and see what happens.
> 
> 
> > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, David E. Box wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 13:25 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> > > > # many are suggestions rather than must-fix
> []
> > > > ERROR:SPACING: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
> > > > #31: FILE: drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c:159:
> > > > +       struct intel_vsec_device __free(kfree) *intel_vsec_dev = NULL;
> > > .
> > > These looks like false positives.
> > 
> > I agree. If I interpret the error message right checkpatch seems to think
> > that's a multiplication which is not the case here.

So __free is an odd $Attribute as it takes an argument.
I've added it along with the other odd $Attribute __alloc_size
to another variable called $ArgAttribute and $Attribute.

Oddly, I don't understand why perl does not perform
the elimination using

	$foo =~ s/\b$ArgAttribute\b//g;

but does do the elimination using

	$foo =~ s/\b$ArgAttribute//g;

maybe something to do with the closing parenthesis in the match.

So now there is a separate substitution for this in a test.

Comments?

---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 25fdb7fda1128..501383fa31c55 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -488,9 +488,14 @@ our $InitAttributeConst = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:initconst\b)};
 our $InitAttributeInit = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:init\b)};
 our $InitAttribute = qr{$InitAttributeData|$InitAttributeConst|$InitAttributeInit};
 
+our $ArgAttribute = qr{(?x:
+			__alloc_size\s*\(\s*\d+\s*(?:,\s*\d+\s*)?\)|
+			__free\s*\(\s*\w+\s*\)
+)};
+
 # Notes to $Attribute:
 # We need \b after 'init' otherwise 'initconst' will cause a false positive in a check
-our $Attribute	= qr{
+our $Attribute	= qr{(?x:
 			const|
 			volatile|
 			__percpu|
@@ -516,8 +521,8 @@ our $Attribute	= qr{
 			____cacheline_aligned_in_smp|
 			____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp|
 			__weak|
-			__alloc_size\s*\(\s*\d+\s*(?:,\s*\d+\s*)?\)
-		  }x;
+			$ArgAttribute
+		  )};
 our $Modifier;
 our $Inline	= qr{inline|__always_inline|noinline|__inline|__inline__};
 our $Member	= qr{->$Ident|\.$Ident|\[[^]]*\]};
@@ -4091,6 +4096,9 @@ sub process {
 			# remove $Attribute/$Sparse uses to simplify comparisons
 			$sl =~ s/\b(?:$Attribute|$Sparse)\b//g;
 			$pl =~ s/\b(?:$Attribute|$Sparse)\b//g;
+			$sl =~ s/\b(?:$ArgAttribute)//g;
+			$pl =~ s/\b(?:$ArgAttribute)//g;
+
 			if (($pl =~ /^\+\s+$Declare\s*$Ident\s*[=,;:\[]/ ||
 			# function pointer declarations
 			     $pl =~ /^\+\s+$Declare\s*\(\s*\*\s*$Ident\s*\)\s*[=,;:\[\(]/ ||


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-12  2:38 [PATCH V3 00/16] intel_pmc: Add telemetry API to read counters David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 01/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Move structures to header David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 02/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: remove platform_info from vsec device structure David E. Box
2023-10-12 15:31   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-12 16:55     ` David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 03/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use cleanup.h David E. Box
2023-10-12  5:25   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-12 17:23     ` David E. Box
2023-10-13 10:39       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-13 18:14         ` Joe Perches
2023-10-24  5:15           ` Joe Perches [this message]
2023-10-12  5:48   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-12 14:46   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-12 17:13     ` David E. Box
2023-10-13 10:54       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-13 22:16         ` David E. Box
2023-10-16 12:02           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 04/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add intel_vsec_register David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 05/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add base address field David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 06/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add header to struct intel_pmt_entry David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 07/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt: telemetry: Export API to read telemetry David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 08/16] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Call pmc_get_low_power_modes from platform init David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 09/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow pmc_core_ssram_init to fail David E. Box
2023-10-12 15:01   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-12 17:52     ` David E. Box
2023-10-13 11:36       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 10/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Split pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc() David E. Box
2023-10-12 15:14   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-12 17:28     ` David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 11/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Find and register PMC telemetry entries David E. Box
2023-10-12 15:17   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 12/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Display LPM requirements for multiple PMCs David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 13/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Retrieve LPM information using Intel PMT David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 14/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Read low power mode requirements for MTL-M and MTL-P David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 15/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add debug attribute for Die C6 counter David E. Box
2023-10-12  2:38 ` [PATCH V3 16/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Show Die C6 counter on Meteor Lake David E. Box

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3ca8db7c045909c9fff6bc3e96a7b8de1b05f8d.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®