From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 8/8] x86/sev/docs: Document the SNP Reverse Map Table (RMP)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:50:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3feea54912ad9ff2fc261223db691ca11fc547f.1733172653.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1733172653.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Update the AMD memory encryption documentation to include information on
the Reverse Map Table (RMP) and the two table formats.
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
---
.../arch/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst | 118 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst
index 6df3264f23b9..bd840df708ea 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst
@@ -130,8 +130,126 @@ SNP feature support.
More details in AMD64 APM[1] Vol 2: 15.34.10 SEV_STATUS MSR
+Reverse Map Table (RMP)
+=======================
+
+The RMP is a structure in system memory that is used to ensure a one-to-one
+mapping between system physical addresses and guest physical addresses. Each
+page of memory that is potentially assignable to guests has one entry within
+the RMP.
+
+The RMP table can be either contiguous in memory or a collection of segments
+in memory.
+
+Contiguous RMP
+--------------
+
+Support for this form of the RMP is present when support for SEV-SNP is
+present, which can be determined using the CPUID instruction::
+
+ 0x8000001f[eax]:
+ Bit[4] indicates support for SEV-SNP
+
+The location of the RMP is identified to the hardware through two MSRs::
+
+ 0xc0010132 (RMP_BASE):
+ System physical address of the first byte of the RMP
+
+ 0xc0010133 (RMP_END):
+ System physical address of the last byte of the RMP
+
+Hardware requires that RMP_BASE and (RPM_END + 1) be 8KB aligned, but SEV
+firmware increases the alignment requirement to require a 1MB alignment.
+
+The RMP consists of a 16KB region used for processor bookkeeping followed
+by the RMP entries, which are 16 bytes in size. The size of the RMP
+determines the range of physical memory that the hypervisor can assign to
+SEV-SNP guests. The RMP covers the system physical address from::
+
+ 0 to ((RMP_END + 1 - RMP_BASE - 16KB) / 16B) x 4KB.
+
+The current Linux support relies on BIOS to allocate/reserve the memory for
+the RMP and to set RMP_BASE and RMP_END appropriately. Linux uses the MSR
+values to locate the RMP and determine the size of the RMP. The RMP must
+cover all of system memory in order for Linux to enable SEV-SNP.
+
+Segmented RMP
+-------------
+
+Segmented RMP support is a new way of representing the layout of an RMP.
+Initial RMP support required the RMP table to be contiguous in memory.
+RMP accesses from a NUMA node on which the RMP doesn't reside
+can take longer than accesses from a NUMA node on which the RMP resides.
+Segmented RMP support allows the RMP entries to be located on the same
+node as the memory the RMP is covering, potentially reducing latency
+associated with accessing an RMP entry associated with the memory. Each
+RMP segment covers a specific range of system physical addresses.
+
+Support for this form of the RMP can be determined using the CPUID
+instruction::
+
+ 0x8000001f[eax]:
+ Bit[23] indicates support for segmented RMP
+
+If supported, segmented RMP attributes can be found using the CPUID
+instruction::
+
+ 0x80000025[eax]:
+ Bits[5:0] minimum supported RMP segment size
+ Bits[11:6] maximum supported RMP segment size
+
+ 0x80000025[ebx]:
+ Bits[9:0] number of cacheable RMP segment definitions
+ Bit[10] indicates if the number of cacheable RMP segments
+ is a hard limit
+
+To enable a segmented RMP, a new MSR is available::
+
+ 0xc0010136 (RMP_CFG):
+ Bit[0] indicates if segmented RMP is enabled
+ Bits[13:8] contains the size of memory covered by an RMP
+ segment (expressed as a power of 2)
+
+The RMP segment size defined in the RMP_CFG MSR applies to all segments
+of the RMP. Therefore each RMP segment covers a specific range of system
+physical addresses. For example, if the RMP_CFG MSR value is 0x2401, then
+the RMP segment coverage value is 0x24 => 36, meaning the size of memory
+covered by an RMP segment is 64GB (1 << 36). So the first RMP segment
+covers physical addresses from 0 to 0xF_FFFF_FFFF, the second RMP segment
+covers physical addresses from 0x10_0000_0000 to 0x1F_FFFF_FFFF, etc.
+
+When a segmented RMP is enabled, RMP_BASE points to the RMP bookkeeping
+area as it does today (16K in size). However, instead of RMP entries
+beginning immediately after the bookkeeping area, there is a 4K RMP
+segment table (RST). Each entry in the RST is 8-bytes in size and represents
+an RMP segment::
+
+ Bits[19:0] mapped size (in GB)
+ The mapped size can be less than the defined segment size.
+ A value of zero, indicates that no RMP exists for the range
+ of system physical addresses associated with this segment.
+ Bits[51:20] segment physical address
+ This address is left shift 20-bits (or just masked when
+ read) to form the physical address of the segment (1MB
+ alignment).
+
+The RST can hold 512 segment entries but can be limited in size to the number
+of cacheable RMP segments (CPUID 0x80000025_EBX[9:0]) if the number of cacheable
+RMP segments is a hard limit (CPUID 0x80000025_EBX[10]).
+
+The current Linux support relies on BIOS to allocate/reserve the memory for
+the segmented RMP (the bookkeeping area, RST, and all segments), build the RST
+and to set RMP_BASE, RMP_END, and RMP_CFG appropriately. Linux uses the MSR
+values to locate the RMP and determine the size and location of the RMP
+segments. The RMP must cover all of system memory in order for Linux to enable
+SEV-SNP.
+
+More details in the AMD64 APM Vol 2, section "15.36.3 Reverse Map Table",
+docID: 24593.
+
Secure VM Service Module (SVSM)
===============================
+
SNP provides a feature called Virtual Machine Privilege Levels (VMPL) which
defines four privilege levels at which guest software can run. The most
privileged level is 0 and numerically higher numbers have lesser privileges.
--
2.46.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 20:50 [PATCH v6 0/8] Provide support for RMPREAD and a segmented RMP Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] x86/sev: Prepare for using the RMPREAD instruction to access the RMP Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 16:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-03 16:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 20:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] x86/sev: Add support for the RMPREAD instruction Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] x86/sev: Require the RMPREAD instruction after Zen4 Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] x86/sev: Move the SNP probe routine out of the way Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] x86/sev: Map only the RMP table entries instead of the full RMP range Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] x86/sev: Treat the contiguous RMP table as a single RMP segment Tom Lendacky
2024-12-09 19:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-10 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-10 10:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-10 14:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] x86/sev: Add full support for a segmented RMP table Tom Lendacky
2024-12-12 9:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-12 14:46 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-12 15:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-13 14:55 ` [PATCH v6.1 " Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:50 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2024-12-16 14:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] Provide support for RMPREAD and a segmented RMP Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3feea54912ad9ff2fc261223db691ca11fc547f.1733172653.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®