From: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@amd.com>
To: "Hook, Gary" <ghook@amd.com>,
"Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iommu/amd: Add basic debugfs infrastructure for AMD IOMMU
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:57:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4534417-0fc0-5e38-ab80-2ffc9cfee2fa@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efa2b7a3-04a7-20b1-3651-89ebafa85c27@amd.com>
On 04/17/2018 12:38 PM, Hook, Gary wrote:
> On 4/13/2018 8:08 PM, Mehta, Sohil wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 08:17 -0500, Gary R Hook wrote:
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&amd_iommu_debugfs_lock);
>>> + if (!amd_iommu_debugfs) {
>>> + d_top = iommu_debugfs_setup();
>>> + if (d_top)
>>> + amd_iommu_debugfs =
>>> debugfs_create_dir("amd", d_top);
>>> + }
>>> + mutex_unlock(&amd_iommu_debugfs_lock);
>>
>>
>> You can do the above only once if you iterate over the IOMMUs here
>> instead of doing it in amd_iommu_init.
>
> I'm not sure it matters, given the finite number of IOMMUs in a system,
> and the fact that this work is done exactly once. However, removal of a
> lock is fine thing, so I'll move this around.
After thinking about this, and looking at the code, I've decided to
leave this alone.
v4 is on its way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-06 13:17 [PATCH v3 0/2] Base enablement of IOMMU debugfs support Gary R Hook
2018-04-06 13:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] iommu - Enable debugfs exposure of the IOMMU Gary R Hook
2018-04-13 23:55 ` Mehta, Sohil
2018-04-17 17:36 ` Hook, Gary
2018-04-17 17:55 ` Robin Murphy
2018-04-17 18:06 ` Hook, Gary
2018-04-17 17:46 ` Hook, Gary
2018-04-17 18:13 ` Robin Murphy
2018-04-06 13:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] iommu/amd: Add basic debugfs infrastructure for AMD IOMMU Gary R Hook
2018-04-14 0:08 ` Mehta, Sohil
2018-04-17 17:38 ` Hook, Gary
2018-04-18 5:58 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-04-18 7:27 ` Mehta, Sohil
2018-04-18 8:31 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-04-18 20:16 ` Mehta, Sohil
2018-04-18 20:51 ` Hook, Gary
2018-04-19 1:52 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-04-30 19:57 ` Gary R Hook [this message]
2018-04-17 0:52 ` Mehta, Sohil
2018-04-17 17:42 ` Hook, Gary
2018-04-17 18:05 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4534417-0fc0-5e38-ab80-2ffc9cfee2fa@amd.com \
--to=gary.hook@amd.com \
--cc=ghook@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome