mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jose Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] devcoredump: Remove devcoredump device if failing device is gone
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:48:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d57dc34fa8b0e25cec014b8001dcd0527d1c1013.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240126151121.1076079-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 10:11 -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Make dev_coredumpm a real device managed helper, that not only
> frees the device after a scheduled delay (DEVCD_TIMEOUT), but
> also when the failing/crashed device is gone.
> 
> The module remove for the drivers using devcoredump are currently
> broken if attempted between the crash and the DEVCD_TIMEOUT, since
> the symbolic sysfs link won't be deleted.

Hmm, is it a problem to remove a whole dev when it still has some link
here? Maybe we could just make the link be managed/auto-removed?

Probably regardless of that you should change the comment in
devcd_dev_release() since it's no longer a concern?

> On top of that, for PCI devices, the unbind of the device will
> call the pci .remove void function, that cannot fail. At that
> time, our device is pretty much gone, but the read and free
> functions are alive trough the devcoredump device and they
                      ^ through, I guess

> can get some NULL dereferences or use after free.

Not sure I understand this part, how's this related to PCI's .remove?

> So, if the failing-device is gone let's also request for the
> devcoredump-device removal using the same mod_delayed_work
> as when writing anything through data. The flush cannot be
> used since it is synchronous and the devcd would be surely
> gone right before the mutex_unlock on the next line.

Can we just decouple it instead and remove the symlink? Which is kind of
what the comment in devcd_dev_release() says but at the time I wasn't
aware of all the devm mechanics etc.

I'm thinking this might be annoying in certain recovery cases, e.g.
iwlwifi uses this but may sometimes unbind/rebind itself to recover from
certain errors, and that'd make the FW dumps disappear.

johannes

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-29 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26 15:11 Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-26 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] devcoredump: Remove the mutex serialization Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-29 15:50   ` Souza, Jose
2024-01-30 12:02   ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-01-30 15:34     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-31 16:15       ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] devcoredump: Remove devcoredump device if failing device is gone Souza, Jose
2024-01-29 17:48 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2024-01-29 21:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-29 21:51     ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-30 15:16       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-30 15:19         ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-30 15:49           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-30 15:51             ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-31 17:22   ` Mukesh Ojha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d57dc34fa8b0e25cec014b8001dcd0527d1c1013.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®