From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jose Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] devcoredump: Remove devcoredump device if failing device is gone
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f085796d-df7e-03c9-a2b5-56cd6897a347@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d57dc34fa8b0e25cec014b8001dcd0527d1c1013.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 1/29/2024 11:18 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 10:11 -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> Make dev_coredumpm a real device managed helper, that not only
>> frees the device after a scheduled delay (DEVCD_TIMEOUT), but
>> also when the failing/crashed device is gone.
>>
>> The module remove for the drivers using devcoredump are currently
>> broken if attempted between the crash and the DEVCD_TIMEOUT, since
>> the symbolic sysfs link won't be deleted.
>
> Hmm, is it a problem to remove a whole dev when it still has some link
> here? Maybe we could just make the link be managed/auto-removed?
>
> Probably regardless of that you should change the comment in
> devcd_dev_release() since it's no longer a concern?
>
>> On top of that, for PCI devices, the unbind of the device will
>> call the pci .remove void function, that cannot fail. At that
>> time, our device is pretty much gone, but the read and free
>> functions are alive trough the devcoredump device and they
> ^ through, I guess
>
>> can get some NULL dereferences or use after free.
>
> Not sure I understand this part, how's this related to PCI's .remove?
>
>> So, if the failing-device is gone let's also request for the
>> devcoredump-device removal using the same mod_delayed_work
>> as when writing anything through data. The flush cannot be
>> used since it is synchronous and the devcd would be surely
>> gone right before the mutex_unlock on the next line.
>
> Can we just decouple it instead and remove the symlink? Which is kind of
> what the comment in devcd_dev_release() says but at the time I wasn't
> aware of all the devm mechanics etc.
Are we going to do this ?
-Mukesh
>
> I'm thinking this might be annoying in certain recovery cases, e.g.
> iwlwifi uses this but may sometimes unbind/rebind itself to recover from
> certain errors, and that'd make the FW dumps disappear.
>
> johannes
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-26 15:11 Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-26 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] devcoredump: Remove the mutex serialization Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-29 15:50 ` Souza, Jose
2024-01-30 12:02 ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-01-30 15:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-31 16:15 ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] devcoredump: Remove devcoredump device if failing device is gone Souza, Jose
2024-01-29 17:48 ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-29 21:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-29 21:51 ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-30 15:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-30 15:19 ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-30 15:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-30 15:51 ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-31 17:22 ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f085796d-df7e-03c9-a2b5-56cd6897a347@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®