From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/compaction: remove stale fast_find_block flag in isolate_migratepages
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:42:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d58cca96-4b98-8b27-1ad9-884e4db926af@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728171037.2219226-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So
> we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from
> fast_find_migrateblock.
> In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in
> fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock,
> then fast_find_block is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 12 +-----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode =
> (sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) |
> (cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0);
> - bool fast_find_block;
>
> /*
> * Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as
> @@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)
> block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn;
>
> - /*
> - * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid
> - * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast
> - * search was successful.
> - */
> - fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
> -
> /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
>
> @@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> * Do not cross the free scanner.
> */
> for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
> - fast_find_block = false,
> cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
> block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
> block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
> @@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
> * not scan the same block.
> */
> - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
> - !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
> + if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
I do not think so. If the pageblock is found by
fast_find_migrateblock(), that means it definitely has not been set the
skip flag, so there is not need to call isolation_suitable() if
fast_find_block is true, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 17:10 [PATCH 0/8] Fixes and cleanups to compaction Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/compaction: avoid missing last page block in section after skip offline sections Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-29 2:23 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-31 12:01 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 2:18 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 2:36 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 3:53 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 6:08 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 8:01 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 8:42 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 9:32 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 12:33 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-02 1:11 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-02 1:26 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/compaction: correct last_migrated_pfn update in compact_zone Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 2:09 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 2:19 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/compaction: skip page block marked skip in isolate_migratepages_block Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 2:35 ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/compaction: remove stale fast_find_block flag in isolate_migratepages Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 2:42 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-08-01 3:24 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 3:34 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 3:48 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 8:15 ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/compaction: corret comment of cached migrate pfn update Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01 2:45 ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/compaction: correct comment to complete migration failure Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/compaction: remove unnecessary return for void function Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01 2:53 ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/compaction: only set skip flag if cc->no_set_skip_hint is false Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01 3:02 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d58cca96-4b98-8b27-1ad9-884e4db926af@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®