From: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>,
vishalm@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
linux@ew.tq-group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Kconfig.platforms: remove useless select for ARCH_K3
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 20:14:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5a03f2c-21a2-4cd6-acfe-9142f51a8655@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9042d63de85f7ae8bf73760e9d2d7652c18a738c.camel@ew.tq-group.com>
Hi,
+ Vignesh who was lost in email list , sorry for that
Le 02/07/2025 à 09:25, Matthias Schiffer a écrit :
> On Tue, 2025-07-01 at 20:57 +0200, Guillaume La Roque wrote:
>>
>> Le 01/07/2025 à 16:36, Matthias Schiffer a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 2025-05-19 at 10:20 +0200, Guillaume La Roque wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After patch done on TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER[1] and TI_SCI_PROTOCOL[2] driver
>>>> select on ARCH_K3 are not needed anymore.
>>>> Select MAILBOX by default is not needed anymore[3],
>>>> PM_GENERIC_DOMAIN if PM was enabled by default so not needed.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>
>>> what selects PM_GENERIC_DOMAIN in your configuration? linux-next fails to boot
>>> on our AM62x-based TQMa62xx if I don't (partially) revert this patch - I have
>>> not found a way to enable PM_GENERIC_DOMAIN and TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS without
>>> enabling other unneeded features to pull it in.
>>>
>> With master branch if i apply this patch and i do make ARCH=arm64
>> defconfig and check in .config both TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS and
>> PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS are enabled.
>> with linux-next it's same. i don't really understand link with PM part
>> in this patch and boot issue on your SOM.
>>
>> I probably misunderstand something.
>>
>>
>> what is your problem exactly ?
>>
>> if you can share log or link to jobs
>
>
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> with arm64_defconfig, this problem doesn't occur, as other CONFIG_ARCH_* symbols
> also have "select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS" (with or without "if PM").
>
> We are using a smaller config specific to our K3-based SOMs however. I have
> attached a defconfig that shows the problem - if you use this as the base for
> .config on linux-next, there is no way to enable TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS, as nothing
> selects PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS.
>
> So unless I'm missing some other configuration that would actually be useful on
> the K3 platform and that would pull in PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS, I think that part
> needs to be reverted. I can send a patch to that effect later.
>
not sure good patch was to enable PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS on ARCH_K3 but it's
a deps on TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS so perhaps do a select in PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
Kconfig instead of a depends on should be a better solution .
Nishanth and vignesh what do you prefer for this issue ?
thanks
Guillaume
> Best,
> Matthias
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Guillaume
>>
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Remove it and give possibility to enable this driver in modules.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20180828005311.8529-1-nm@ti.com/
>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250220-ti-firmware-v2-1-ff26883c6ce9@baylibre.com/
>>>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250507135213.g6li6ufp3cosxoys@stinging/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - Remove some other config after comment from Nishanth.
>>>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250504-kconfig-v1-1-ab0216f4fa98@baylibre.com
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 4 ----
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>>> index 8b76821f190f..bf9e3d76b4c0 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>>> @@ -135,11 +135,7 @@ config ARCH_SPARX5
>>>>
>>>> config ARCH_K3
>>>> bool "Texas Instruments Inc. K3 multicore SoC architecture"
>>>> - select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
>>>> - select MAILBOX
>>>> select SOC_TI
>>>> - select TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER
>>>> - select TI_SCI_PROTOCOL
>>>> select TI_K3_SOCINFO
>>>> help
>>>> This enables support for Texas Instruments' K3 multicore SoC
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> base-commit: e8ab83e34bdc458b5cd77f201e4ed04807978fb1
>>>> change-id: 20250504-kconfig-68f139fbf337
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-19 8:20 Guillaume La Roque
2025-06-24 18:42 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2025-07-01 14:36 ` Matthias Schiffer
2025-07-01 18:57 ` Guillaume La Roque
2025-07-02 7:25 ` Matthias Schiffer
2025-07-02 18:14 ` Guillaume La Roque [this message]
2025-07-03 12:28 ` Nishanth Menon
2025-07-07 9:59 ` Guillaume La Roque
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5a03f2c-21a2-4cd6-acfe-9142f51a8655@baylibre.com \
--to=glaroque@baylibre.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vishalm@ti.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®