Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8450: Keep pll types as is for SM8475

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 7/12/26 5:10 AM, Esteban Urrutia via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Esteban Urrutia <esteuwu@proton.me>
> 
> While using an OLE PLL type is correct according to downstream code, this
> results in the display flickering at boot for SM8475 because downstream
> uses EVO type configurations for both clocks, while, for some reason,
> upstream uses EVO type configurations for SM8450 and OLE type
> configurations for SM8475.
> So far, no regressions have been observed and the display no longer
> flickers.

No, these are two separate hardware designs and you can't mix the
configuration like that just because it so happens to circumvent a bug.

Taking a peek at clk_lucid_evo_pll_configure, there's an early bailout:

if (trion_pll_is_enabled(pll, regmap)) {
	pr_debug("Lucid Evo PLL is already enabled, skipping configuration\n");
	return;
}

I think it should be fine to copy-paste it as-is for LUCID_OLE. Please
check if that resolves your issue.

Konrad