mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
To: Michael Dege <michael.dege@renesas.com>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: renesas: rswitch: fix forwarding offload statemachine
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6a9356d-6fd4-459b-9c5a-2f3e20368bbd@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b1405cd-6c7f-4883-95fb-151cab223a68@cogentembedded.com>



WBR,
Nikita Yushchenko,
System Software Engineer @ Cogent Embedded

05.02.2026 08:47, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
> Hello Michael
> 
>> -        } else if (rdev->forwarding_offloaded) {
>> +        } else if (rdev->forwarding_offloaded &&
>> +               !rdev->forwarding_requested) {
>>               rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
>>           }
> 
> Although indeed the condition in the current code is not correct, I'm not sure comfortable with this fix.
> 
> Full condition for a port to be a valid candidate for hardware forwarding is
> 
>    rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested
> 
> It is not obvious if at this point rdev_for_l2_offload() could get changed from the last call to 
> rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(), so using only the partial condition at this point does not look good 
> for me.
> 
> I'd suggest to either change to something like
> 
> if (rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested && !rdev->forwarding_offloaded)
>      rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, true, false);
> if (!(rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested) && rdev->forwarding_offloaded)
>      rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
> 
> Or maybe just
> 
> if (rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested)
>      rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, true, false);
> else
>      rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
> 
> since rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading() has internal check for the current state and returns early if 
> the requested change is already applied.

May be even better to add

   bool new_forwarding_offloaded = rdev_for_l2_offload(rdev) && rdev->forwarding_requested;

at the beginning of the loop body, and use this flag over the loop - it will make the code shorter and 
cleaner.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05  7:14 Michael Dege
2026-02-05  7:47 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-05  7:48   ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-05  7:51   ` Michael Dege
2026-02-05  7:58   ` Nikita Yushchenko [this message]
2026-02-05 12:49     ` Michael Dege
2026-02-05 13:38       ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-05 13:46         ` Michael Dege
2026-02-05 13:57           ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-05 14:35             ` Michael Dege
2026-02-05 14:41               ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-05 14:44                 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-06  5:41                   ` Michael Dege
2026-02-06 10:31                     ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-06 10:34                     ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-06 13:21                       ` Michael Dege
2026-02-06 15:55                       ` Andrew Lunn
2026-02-06 16:10                         ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-06 17:17                           ` Andrew Lunn
2026-02-05 15:03                 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2026-02-06  5:54                   ` Michael Dege

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6a9356d-6fd4-459b-9c5a-2f3e20368bbd@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.dege@renesas.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®