* [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()
@ 2021-03-19 2:58 Wang Qing
2021-03-19 8:07 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang Qing @ 2021-03-19 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sumit Semwal, Gustavo Padovan, Christian König, linux-media,
dri-devel, linaro-mm-sig, linux-kernel
Cc: Wang Qing
Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 7475e09..de51326
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
struct default_wait_cb *wait =
container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
- wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
+ wake_up_process(wait->task);
}
/**
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()
2021-03-19 2:58 [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state() Wang Qing
@ 2021-03-19 8:07 ` Christian König
2021-03-19 8:17 ` 王擎
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2021-03-19 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang Qing, Sumit Semwal, Gustavo Padovan, linux-media, dri-devel,
linaro-mm-sig, linux-kernel
Am 19.03.21 um 03:58 schrieb Wang Qing:
> Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
> and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree
than DRM?
Thanks,
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index 7475e09..de51326
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> struct default_wait_cb *wait =
> container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
>
> - wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
> + wake_up_process(wait->task);
> }
>
> /**
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re:Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()
2021-03-19 8:07 ` Christian König
@ 2021-03-19 8:17 ` 王擎
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: 王擎 @ 2021-03-19 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König; +Cc: linux-media, linux-kernel
>> Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
>> and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
>Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree
>than DRM?
Pick it up just fine, thanks,
WangQing.
>
>Thanks,
>Christian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-19 8:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-19 2:58 [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state() Wang Qing
2021-03-19 8:07 ` Christian König
2021-03-19 8:17 ` 王擎
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®