mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: imran.f.khan@oracle.com
To: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"jiangshanlai@gmail.com" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] workqueue: introduce queue_delayed_work_on_offline_safe.
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:54:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d825b484-9917-4ccf-b94d-a5446ff570a0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28ECBC8D-FD58-4A32-A9DE-7839BD2A77D7@oracle.com>

Hello Haakon,
Thanks a lot for providing your feedback.

On 3/2/2025 10:48 pm, Haakon Bugge wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31 Jan 2025, at 12:16, Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hello again Tejun,
>> sorry, just found one mistake in earlier shared patch, it
>> missed an unlock done below:
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Imran
>> On 31/1/2025 9:37 pm, imran.f.khan@oracle.com wrote:
>> Hello Tejun,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Could you kindly let me know, if it would be acceptable, to have
>> queue_delayed_work_on_offline_safe, as a wrapper around
>> queue_delayed_work_on, such that it can check and ensure CPU's
>> availability. If it can't, then it can simply return false and let
>> caller decide which cpu to use next. Something like below:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
>> index b0dc957c3e560..57f39807f3bf1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
>> @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ extern bool queue_work_node(int node, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
>>                            struct work_struct *work);
>> extern bool queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
>>                        struct delayed_work *work, unsigned long delay);
>> +extern bool queue_delayed_work_on_offline_safe(int cpu,
>> +                       struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct delayed_work *work,
>> +                       unsigned long delay);
> 
> Hi Imran,
> 
> 
> I am not quite sure this signature will be OK. See below.
> 
>> extern bool mod_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
>>                        struct delayed_work *dwork, unsigned long delay);
>> extern bool queue_rcu_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct rcu_work *rwork);
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
>> index 9362484a653c4..7d3b8050422e4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
>> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
>> @@ -2565,6 +2565,37 @@ bool queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(queue_delayed_work_on);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * queue_delayed_work_on_offline_safe - queue work on specific online CPU after
>> + *                                     delay,
>> + *
>> + * @cpu: CPU number to execute work on
>> + * @wq: workqueue to use
>> + * @dwork: work to queue
>> + * @delay: number of jiffies to wait before queueing
>> + *
>> + * a wrapper, around queue_delayed_work_on, that checks and ensures that
>> + * specified @cpu is online. If @cpu is found to be offline or if its online
>> + * status can't be reliably determined, return false and leave the decision,
>> + * of selecting new cpu for delayed_work, to caller.
> 
> The return value here is ambiguous.
>
Agree. Thanks for pointing this out. I have modified this patch,
as per your suggestion and have sent a v2 of my earlier approach.
Please see [1].

Could you please have a look and let me know your opinion.

Thanks,
Imran

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250204054404.268888-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com/

      reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-13  4:35 Imran Khan
2025-01-13 18:21 ` Tejun Heo
2025-01-14  3:01   ` imran.f.khan
2025-01-17  5:27     ` imran.f.khan
2025-01-31 10:37     ` imran.f.khan
2025-01-31 11:16       ` imran.f.khan
2025-02-03 11:48         ` Haakon Bugge
2025-02-04  5:54           ` imran.f.khan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d825b484-9917-4ccf-b94d-a5446ff570a0@oracle.com \
    --to=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=haakon.bugge@oracle.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®