Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID even if INVVPID is not exposed in vmx capability

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> index 06d8080..b310214 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> @@ -1239,6 +1239,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_global(void)
>>>       return vmx_capability.vpid & VMX_VPID_EXTENT_GLOBAL_CONTEXT_BIT;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_invvpid(void)
>>> +{
>>> +     return vmx_capability.vpid & VMX_VPID_INVVPID_BIT;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_ept(void)
>>>  {
>>>       return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
>>> @@ -6519,8 +6524,10 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
>>>       if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX))
>>>               kvm_enable_efer_bits(EFER_NX);
>>>
>>> -     if (!cpu_has_vmx_vpid())
>>> +     if (!cpu_has_vmx_vpid() ||
>>> +             !(cpu_has_vmx_invvpid()))
>>
>> This indentation looks weird. Can't this be fit into one line?
> 
> The same as cpu_has_vmx_ept_4levels().

I only know the general rules:

1. make things fit into one line unless it really harms readability
2. when splitting conditions over multiple lines, make them start at the
same level.

And I said, this indentation looks weird, because 1 and 2 are not met.

Anyhow, the general patch is fine in my opinion.

-- 

Thanks,

David