Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: More support for TUXEDO devices

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1819 bytes --]

On Wed, 25 Mar 2026, Werner Sembach wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Am 25.03.26 um 13:40 schrieb Ilpo Järvinen:
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, Werner Sembach wrote:
> > 
> > > v2: Incorporate Armins feedback.
> > > v3: Incorporate more of Armins feedback.
> > >      Rework USB-C power prio functions
> > > v4: Readd system vendor SchenkerTechnologiesGmbH for XMG FUSION (L19)
> > >      Replace for loops with if statements for USB-C power priority
> > > functions
> > >      Add missing mutex in usb_c_power_priority_restore
> > > v5: Restructure patch around new entry for XMG Fusion
> > >      Add missing Reviewed-by and Tested-by
> > >      Spelling fixes in documentation
> > > v6: Fix small format error in docs
> > >      Fix Reviewed-by line
> > > v7: Variable rename to lowercase
> > > v8: Move USB-C power priority init to after probe call
> > >      Clarify documentation
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Does this conflict with something that went through the fixes branch? I
> > tried applying this through for-next and get fails so I guess I'll have
> > to merge fixes to for-next before I can apply this.
> > 
> > It would be nice to mention any known conflicts in the coverletter.
> 
> sorry, I thought the base-commit line was enough
> 
> it applies cleanly to v7.0-rc3 and v7.0-rc4
> 
> earlier rc versions of 7.0 are missing a required patch

Okay, so there's a dependency for some commit that went through 'fixes'?

> maybe for-next is not yet rebased on the latest rc?

'fixes' and 'for-next' are sort of independent normally. Both are based at 
-rc1.

I don't rebase 'for-next' from -rc1. If there's a conflict or some 'fixes' 
commit needed for a work to be done in 'for-next', I'll resolve those by 
merging 'fixes' changes back into 'for-next.

> I will have a look

-- 
 i.