From: Pradeep Pragallapati <pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@sandisk.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
gopikrishna.garmidi@oss.qualcomm.com,
jagadeesh.kona@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com, sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com,
Taniya Das <taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Add UFS nodes
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 20:18:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db1414fd-2202-4dd6-a420-7dc505b91f77@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <chmhun7dqj5flvbkzpsoz3pdbjrcbplel5rqfvj3fc6ztaw2sa@4o55fods7yaf>
On 9/14/2026 7:36 PM, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 26-09-11 22:17:07, Pradeep P V K wrote:
>> Add UFS PHY and UFS host controller nodes for Glymur SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> One nit below.
>
> With Konrad's comments addressed, I think it looks good, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
>> index 624a9edd602c..7bbc804ed340 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
>> @@ -812,9 +812,9 @@ gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
>> <0>, /* QUSB4 1 PHY RX 1 */
>> <0>, /* QUSB4 2 PHY RX 0 */
>> <0>, /* QUSB4 2 PHY RX 1 */
>> - <0>, /* UFS PHY RX Symbol 0 */
>> - <0>, /* UFS PHY RX Symbol 1 */
>> - <0>, /* UFS PHY TX Symbol 0 */
>> + <&ufs_mem_phy 0>, /* UFS PHY RX Symbol 0 */
>> + <&ufs_mem_phy 1>, /* UFS PHY RX Symbol 1 */
>> + <&ufs_mem_phy 2>, /* UFS PHY TX Symbol 0 */
>> <&usb_0_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_USB3_PIPE_CLK>,
>> <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_USB3_PIPE_CLK>,
>> <&usb_2_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_USB3_PIPE_CLK>,
>> @@ -4103,6 +4103,114 @@ rng: rng@10c3000 {
>> reg = <0x0 0x010c3000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> };
>>
>> + ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d80000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,glymur-qmp-ufs-phy";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x01d80000 0x0 0x2000>;
>> +
>> + clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>,
>> + /* UFS and PCIE4 shares the same clkref on glymur */
>
> On top of Konrad's comment, I'd drop the "on glymur" part entirely here.
sure, i will remove it in my next patchset.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 16:47 [PATCH 0/5] Add UFS support for Glymur Qualcomm SoC Pradeep P V K
2026-09-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy: Document Glymur QMP UFS PHY Pradeep P V K
2026-09-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Document Glymur UFS controller Pradeep P V K
2026-09-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Add UFS nodes Pradeep P V K
2026-09-14 9:14 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-09-16 14:47 ` Pradeep Pragallapati
2026-09-14 14:06 ` Abel Vesa
2026-09-16 14:48 ` Pradeep Pragallapati [this message]
2026-09-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur-qcb: Enable UFS Pradeep P V K
2026-09-14 9:14 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-09-16 14:49 ` Pradeep Pragallapati
2026-09-14 14:04 ` Abel Vesa
2026-09-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add Glymur support Pradeep P V K
2026-09-14 13:49 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-09-14 14:03 ` Abel Vesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db1414fd-2202-4dd6-a420-7dc505b91f77@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=avri.altman@sandisk.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=gopikrishna.garmidi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jagadeesh.kona@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®