From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: use blk_mq_requeue_request in __scsi_queue_insert
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:00:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db9c47e6-d8ea-1e9e-609a-ff1b1db3769c@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519702875.3120.7.camel@wdc.com>
Hi Bart
Thanks for your kindly response.
On 02/27/2018 11:41 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 11:28 +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
>> If that is true, what if aacraid driver uses block legacy instead of blk-mq ?
>> w/ blk-mq disabled, __scsi_queue_insert just requeue the request with blk_requeue_request.
>>
>> __scsi_queue_insert
>> ...
>> if (q->mq_ops) {
>> scsi_mq_requeue_cmd(cmd);
>> return;
>> }
>> spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
>> blk_requeue_request(q, cmd->request);
>> kblockd_schedule_work(&device->requeue_work);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
>> ...
>>
>> no prep/unprep code there for block legacy code.
>
> Hello Jianchao,
>
> For the legacy block layer preparing and unpreparing a request happens from
> inside the block layer core. Please have a look at block/blk-core.c and the
> code in that file that handles the request flag RQF_DONTPREP.
Yes, thanks for your directive.
On the other hand, this patch is to align the actions between blk-mq and block legacy code in __scsi_queue_insert.
As we know, __scsi_queue_insert is just to requeue the request back to queue, as the block legacy code segment above:
for block legacy, it just blk_requeue_request for the request and kick the queue run.
However, for the blk-mq, scsi_mq_requeue_cmd will be invoked, it not only requeue the request, but also unprep request.
This is not what __scsi_queue_insert should do, but scsi_io_completion.
When the request is not finished completely, and scsi_io_completion finds it need a ACTION_REPREP, at the moment,
we need requeue and unprep there.
If I missed something, please feel free to point out. :)
Thanks
Jianchao
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 7:58 Jianchao Wang
2018-02-27 3:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-27 3:28 ` jianchao.wang
2018-02-27 3:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-27 4:00 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-02-27 5:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-27 5:15 ` jianchao.wang
2018-02-27 17:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-27 17:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-28 2:25 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db9c47e6-d8ea-1e9e-609a-ff1b1db3769c@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®