* [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/tu102: remove unused tu102_gr_load function
@ 2023-04-06 12:51 Tom Rix
2023-04-06 20:36 ` (Attn. Skeggsb) " Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rix @ 2023-04-06 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bskeggs, kherbst, lyude, airlied, daniel, gsamaiya
Cc: dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel, Tom Rix
smatch reports
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c:210:1: warning: symbol
'tu102_gr_load' was not declared. Should it be static?
This function is not used so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c
index 3b6c8100a242..a7775aa18541 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c
@@ -206,19 +206,6 @@ tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid(struct nvkm_blob *blob, struct gf100_gr_pack **ppack)
return gk20a_gr_av_to_init_(blob, 64, 0x00100000, ppack);
}
-int
-tu102_gr_load(struct gf100_gr *gr, int ver, const struct gf100_gr_fwif *fwif)
-{
- int ret;
-
- ret = gm200_gr_load(gr, ver, fwif);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- return gk20a_gr_load_net(gr, "gr/", "sw_veid_bundle_init", ver, tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid,
- &gr->bundle_veid);
-}
-
static const struct gf100_gr_fwif
tu102_gr_fwif[] = {
{ 0, gm200_gr_load, &tu102_gr, &gp108_gr_fecs_acr, &gp108_gr_gpccs_acr },
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* (Attn. Skeggsb) Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/tu102: remove unused tu102_gr_load function
2023-04-06 12:51 [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/tu102: remove unused tu102_gr_load function Tom Rix
@ 2023-04-06 20:36 ` Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2023-04-06 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rix, bskeggs, kherbst, airlied, daniel, gsamaiya
Cc: dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel
Hey Ben - this patch looks fine to me but I figured I should check before
giving it the OK: I assume we're not planning on using tu102_gr_load for
anything in the future? (if we are, do we want to just #if 0 this for the time
being?)
On Thu, 2023-04-06 at 08:51 -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> smatch reports
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c:210:1: warning: symbol
> 'tu102_gr_load' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> This function is not used so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c | 13 -------------
> 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c
> index 3b6c8100a242..a7775aa18541 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c
> @@ -206,19 +206,6 @@ tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid(struct nvkm_blob *blob, struct gf100_gr_pack **ppack)
> return gk20a_gr_av_to_init_(blob, 64, 0x00100000, ppack);
> }
>
> -int
> -tu102_gr_load(struct gf100_gr *gr, int ver, const struct gf100_gr_fwif *fwif)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = gm200_gr_load(gr, ver, fwif);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return gk20a_gr_load_net(gr, "gr/", "sw_veid_bundle_init", ver, tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid,
> - &gr->bundle_veid);
> -}
> -
> static const struct gf100_gr_fwif
> tu102_gr_fwif[] = {
> { 0, gm200_gr_load, &tu102_gr, &gp108_gr_fecs_acr, &gp108_gr_gpccs_acr },
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-06 20:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-06 12:51 [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/tu102: remove unused tu102_gr_load function Tom Rix
2023-04-06 20:36 ` (Attn. Skeggsb) " Lyude Paul
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®