From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] of: property: Implement of_fwnode_property_present() by of_property_present()
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 20:44:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc989762-d868-44ff-968c-6d7be19e41cf@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJvh5pddoVEgaKQvGth0ncgtC9AAGxMEiK__NiZKrjmxA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024/12/10 00:48, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 6:54 PM Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
>>
>> of_property_read_bool() is deprecated for non-boolean property, but
>> of_fwnode_property_present() still uses it.
>>
>> Fix by using of_property_present() instead of of_property_read_bool().
>
> of_property_present() just calls of_property_read_bool(). For now. I'm
> working on making using of_property_read_bool() on non-boolean a
> warning. No point in this change until that happens.
>
what about below idea?
replace all of_property_read_bool() usages with of_property_present()
then remove the former.
> Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-10 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 0:52 [PATCH 00/10] of: fix bugs and improve codes Zijun Hu
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 01/10] of: Fix alias name length calculating error in API of_find_node_opts_by_path() Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 13:24 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-09 13:31 ` Zijun Hu
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 02/10] of: Correct return value for API of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 13:26 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 03/10] of: Correct child specifier used as input of the 2nd nexus node Zijun Hu
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 04/10] of: Fix refcount leakage for OF node returned by __of_get_dma_parent() Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 20:32 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 05/10] of: Fix available buffer size calculating error in API of_device_uevent_modalias() Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 20:34 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-10 12:39 ` Zijun Hu
2024-12-10 14:10 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-11 11:44 ` Zijun Hu
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 06/10] of/fdt: Dump __be32 array in CPU type order in of_dump_addr() Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 20:37 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] of: Correct comments for of_alias_scan() Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-09 13:41 ` Zijun Hu
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 08/10] of: Swap implementation between of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool() Zijun Hu
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 09/10] of: property: Implement of_fwnode_property_present() by of_property_present() Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 16:48 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-10 12:44 ` Zijun Hu [this message]
2024-12-10 13:37 ` Robin Murphy
2024-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] of: Simplify API of_find_node_with_property() implementation Zijun Hu
2024-12-09 20:38 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc989762-d868-44ff-968c-6d7be19e41cf@icloud.com \
--to=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=stephen.boyd@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®