From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<hongyu.ning@intel.com>, <chen.yu@linux.dev>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/9] x86/resctrl: Introduce erdt_cpu_has() and erdt_support()
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 14:49:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de9ffda4-c837-4a0b-9468-6cc7b14e0748@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b279eaa7bf8b3b0b09532e8b184ba4d410eb6f86.1789705667.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Hi Chenyu,
On 9/17/26 9:51 PM, Chen Yu wrote:
> Introduce erdt_cpu_has() to verify if a specific RDT feature is backed by an
> ERDT table. erdt_cpu_has() is derived from rdt_cpu_has(), which not only
"is derived from" - needs imperative
> considers firmware (ERDT table and its sub-tables) support for a feature, but
"rdt_cpu_has(), which not only considers firmware (ERDT table ..." reads as though
rdt_cpu_has() considers ERDT, but it does not?
> also considers userspace input like "rdt=!cmt". Similar to rdt_cpu_has(),
> erdt_cpu_has() expects an x86 feature flag as parameter.
>
> Introduce erdt_support() as a helper called by erdt_cpu_has() to check whether
> the ERDT firmware supports a given feature.
>
> erdt_support() deliberately claims no feature yet and returns false. A feature
> may only be reported as ERDT backed once the low level accessors that access
> its data via MMIO exist, otherwise callers would take the ERDT path and find no
> implementation behind it. Features should be added to erdt_support() as their
> MMIO implementations are introduced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> index 9a32ed418c33..bcfcc8ac1fe6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdt_enable_key);
> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdt_alloc_enable_key);
> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdt_mon_enable_key);
>
> +bool erdt_cpu_has(int flag);
> unsigned int erdt_get_scale(void);
Same comment as earlier in response to the erdt_get_scale() prototype
addition.
>
> static inline bool resctrl_arch_alloc_capable(void)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 3514d73a8056..ca7e67f976d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -897,6 +897,29 @@ bool rdt_cpu_has(int flag)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +bool erdt_cpu_has(int flag)
> +{
> + struct rdt_options *o;
> + bool ret;
> +
> + ret = erdt_support(flag);
> +
> + if (!ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + for (o = rdt_options; o < &rdt_options[NUM_RDT_OPTIONS]; o++) {
> + if (flag == o->flag) {
> + if (o->force_off)
> + ret = false;
> + if (o->force_on)
> + ret = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
erdt_cpu_has() is practically identical to rdt_cpu_has() just above it. how about
something like:
static bool apply_rdt_options(int flag, bool ret)
{
struct rdt_options *o;
for (o = rdt_options; o < &rdt_options[NUM_RDT_OPTIONS]; o++) {
...
}
bool rdt_cpu_has(int flag)
{
return apply_rdt_options(flag, boot_cpu_has(flag));
}
bool erdt_cpu_has(int flag)
{
return apply_rdt_options(flag, erdt_support(flag));
}
> bool resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(enum resctrl_event_id evt)
> {
> if (!rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BMEC))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> index a8a7417c2f82..400973ebf2b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ static unsigned int erdt_max_rmid;
> */
> static unsigned int erdt_scale;
>
> +bool erdt_support(int flag)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> unsigned int erdt_get_max_rmid(void)
> {
> return erdt_max_rmid;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 26c3e0c546ad..ce037e017fc3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ static inline void intel_aet_mon_domain_setup(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resour
> static inline bool intel_handle_aet_option(bool force_off, char *tok) { return false; }
> #endif
>
> +bool erdt_support(int flag);
> unsigned int erdt_get_max_rmid(void);
> int erdt_init(void);
> void erdt_exit(void);
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 4:46 [PATCH v8 0/9] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
2026-09-18 4:48 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] x86/topology: Export topo_lookup_cpuid() for resctrl use Chen Yu
2026-09-18 4:48 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] x86/resctrl: Require 64-bit x86 for resctrl support Chen Yu
2026-09-28 21:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-18 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and save CACD cpumask for RMDD domains Chen Yu
2026-09-28 21:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-18 4:50 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] x86/resctrl: Attach ACPI ERDT information to L3 mon domain on CPU online Chen Yu
2026-09-28 21:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-18 4:50 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table Chen Yu
2026-09-28 21:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-18 4:50 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] x86/resctrl: Refactor the monitor read function Chen Yu
2026-09-18 4:50 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Chen Yu
2026-09-28 21:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-18 4:51 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] x86/resctrl: Introduce erdt_cpu_has() and erdt_support() Chen Yu
2026-09-28 21:49 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-09-18 4:51 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] x86/resctrl: Add MMIO-based LLC occupancy monitoring support Chen Yu
2026-09-28 21:54 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de9ffda4-c837-4a0b-9468-6cc7b14e0748@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chen.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hongyu.ning@intel.com \
--cc=hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®