mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
To: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>,
	Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] selftests: tc: set timeout to 15 minutes
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:49:01 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <deeb8fe7-1f0e-bc1c-cde5-74e9af160bf7@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf7f8867-6b14-dd53-a6e4-2addee4a5ad8@huawei.com>

On 13/07/2023 23:25, shaozhengchao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/7/14 5:16, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> When looking for something else in LKFT reports [1], I noticed that the
>> TC selftest ended with a timeout error:
>>
>>    not ok 1 selftests: tc-testing: tdc.sh # TIMEOUT 45 seconds
>>
>> The timeout had been introduced 3 years ago, see the Fixes commit below.
>>
>> This timeout is only in place when executing the selftests via the
>> kselftests runner scripts. I guess this is not what most TC devs are
>> using and nobody noticed the issue before.
>>
>> The new timeout is set to 15 minutes as suggested by Pedro [2]. It looks
>> like it is plenty more time than what it takes in "normal" conditions.
>>
>> Fixes: 852c8cbf34d3 ("selftests/kselftest/runner.sh: Add 45 second 
>> timeout per test")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Link: 
>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230711/testrun/18267241/suite/kselftest-tc-testing/test/tc-testing_tdc_sh/log [1]
>> Link: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0e061d4a-9a23-9f58-3b35-d8919de332d7@tessares.net/T/ [2]
>> Suggested-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/settings | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/settings 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/settings
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..e2206265f67c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/settings
>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
>> +timeout=900
>>
> I remember last year when I tested all the tdc cases(qdisc + filter +
> action + infra) in my vm machine, it took me nearly 20 minutes.
> So I think it should be more than 1200 seconds if all cases need to be
> tested.
> 
> Maybe we should really optimize the parallel execution process of tdc.

Let's try to spend some cycles improving the tdc code performance first.
TDC boils down essentially to:
- Setup namespace (if needed)
- Setup network interfaces
- Spawn a few processes
- Match a regex
- Bring down namespace

Nothing above screams expensive, so I'm sure there are some low hanging 
fruits to improve the overall wall time even in debug kernels.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-14 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-13 21:16 [PATCH net 0/3] selftests: tc: increase timeout and add missing kconfig Matthieu Baerts
2023-07-13 21:16 ` [PATCH net 1/3] selftests: tc: set timeout to 15 minutes Matthieu Baerts
2023-07-14  2:25   ` shaozhengchao
2023-07-14 17:49     ` Pedro Tammela [this message]
2023-07-17  8:32     ` Matthieu Baerts
2023-07-18  1:43       ` shaozhengchao
2023-07-13 21:16 ` [PATCH net 2/3] selftests: tc: add 'ct' action kconfig dep Matthieu Baerts
2023-07-14  2:56   ` shaozhengchao
2023-07-13 21:16 ` [PATCH net 3/3] selftests: tc: add ConnTrack procfs kconfig Matthieu Baerts
2023-07-14  3:25   ` shaozhengchao
2023-07-13 22:41 ` [PATCH net 0/3] selftests: tc: increase timeout and add missing kconfig Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-07-18  8:46 ` Matthieu Baerts
2023-07-19  0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=deeb8fe7-1f0e-bc1c-cde5-74e9af160bf7@mojatatu.com \
    --to=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulb@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®