From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>,
Chen Wang <chen.wang@linux.dev>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <sophgo@lists.linux.dev>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Add support for StarFive JHB100
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:07:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e01a17f2-f736-4b12-9336-bb862dafda59@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919092950.178617-3-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
On 19/09/2026 12:29, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> Add support for the DWCMSHC controller found on the StarFive JHB100
> SoC.
>
> The JHB100 CMSHC controller has only 32-bit DMA capability by default.
> The higher DMA address bits [35:32] can be configured through the
> PER1 SYSCON, extending the DMA address range up to 36 bits. Fix these
> bits to 4, which limits the DMA range to [0x40000000 - 0x4ffffffff].
0x40000000 missing a 0 ?
>
> The cclk_tx clock must be disabled before sdhci_set_clock() to
> eliminate glitches, and re-enabled afterwards. It is enabled during
> probe and disabled in the platform deinit callback, which is invoked
> from dwcmshc_remove().
>
> Additionally, clear the PHY_DLLDL_CNFG_R register and re-initialize
> the PHY when setting UHS signaling, and force 1.8V fixed I/O when the
> DT specifies a DDR/HS200/HS400 1.8V mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> index 1baa2379c9c3..021b03c17312 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
> #define DWCMSHC_ENHANCED_STROBE BIT(8)
> #define DWCMSHC_EMMC_ATCTRL 0x40
> #define DWCMSHC_AT_STAT 0x44
> +/* StarFive JHB100 SoC MSHCCS register */
> +#define DWCMSHC_ARWADDR GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define DWCMSHC_ARWADDR_DEFAULT 4
> /* Tuning and auto-tuning fields in AT_CTRL_R control register */
> #define AT_CTRL_AT_EN BIT(0) /* autotuning is enabled */
> #define AT_CTRL_CI_SEL BIT(1) /* interval to drive center phase select */
> @@ -294,6 +297,11 @@ struct k230_priv {
> struct regmap *hi_sys_regmap;
> };
>
> +struct jhb100_priv {
> + struct clk *cclk_tx;
> + bool cclk_tx_on;
> +};
> +
> #define DWCMSHC_MAX_OTHER_CLKS 3
>
> struct dwcmshc_priv {
> @@ -314,6 +322,7 @@ struct dwcmshc_pltfm_data {
> const struct sdhci_pltfm_data pdata;
> const struct cqhci_host_ops *cqhci_host_ops;
> int (*init)(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_host *host, struct dwcmshc_priv *dwc_priv);
> + void (*deinit)(struct dwcmshc_priv *dwc_priv);
> void (*postinit)(struct sdhci_host *host, struct dwcmshc_priv *dwc_priv);
> };
>
> @@ -2257,6 +2266,145 @@ static const struct dwcmshc_pltfm_data sdhci_dwcmshc_hpe_gsc_pdata = {
> .init = dwcmshc_hpe_gsc_init,
> };
>
> +static int sdhci_jhb100_set_dma_mask(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> + struct device *dev = mmc_dev(mmc);
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * The StarFive JHB100's CMSHC controller only has 32-bit DMA
> + * capability by default, but the higher DMA address bits [35:32]
> + * can be configured through SYSCON, thus supporting up to 36-bit
> + * DMA capability.
Doesn't really explain how a 36-bit DMA mask works if the valid range
is 0x400000000 - 0x4ffffffff
Sashiko questions whether it works:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260919092950.178617-1-changhuang.liang%40starfivetech.com
Perhaps also check its point about leaving cclk_tx on during suspend.
> + */
> + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36));
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set 36-bit DMA mask.\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_jhb100_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct dwcmshc_priv *dwc_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> + struct jhb100_priv *priv = dwc_priv->priv;
> +
> + /* the cclk_tx clock is disabled before sdhci_set_clock() to eliminate glitches */
> + if (priv->cclk_tx_on) {
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->cclk_tx);
> + priv->cclk_tx_on = false;
> + }
> +
> + fsleep(15);
The delay could use a comment explaining why it is needed and
where the value comes from.
> +
> + sdhci_set_clock(host, clock);
> +
> + if (clk_prepare_enable(priv->cclk_tx))
> + dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "failed to re-enable cclk_tx\n");
> + else
> + priv->cclk_tx_on = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_jhb100_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> + unsigned int timing)
> +{
> + dwcmshc_set_uhs_signaling(host, timing);
> + sdhci_writeb(host, 0, PHY_DLLDL_CNFG_R);
> + th1520_sdhci_set_phy(host);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_ops starfive_jhb100_ops = {
> + .set_dma_mask = sdhci_jhb100_set_dma_mask,
> + .set_clock = sdhci_jhb100_set_clock,
> + .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_jhb100_set_uhs_signaling,
> + .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> + .reset = sdhci_reset,
Everywhere else seems to reset via dwcmshc_reset().
Is sdhci_reset() ok here?
> + .get_max_clock = dwcmshc_get_max_clock,
> + .adma_write_desc = dwcmshc_adma_write_desc,
> + .irq = dwcmshc_cqe_irq_handler,
> + .voltage_switch = dwcmshc_phy_init,
> + .platform_execute_tuning = th1520_execute_tuning,
> +};
> +
> +static int dwcmshc_starfive_jhb100_init(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_host *host,
> + struct dwcmshc_priv *dwc_priv)
> +{
> + struct reset_control *reset;
> + struct jhb100_priv *priv;
> + unsigned int reg_offset;
> + struct regmap *syscon;
> + int ret;
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct jhb100_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + syscon = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(dev->of_node,
> + "starfive,jhb100-per1-syscon",
> + 1, ®_offset);
> + if (IS_ERR(syscon))
> + return PTR_ERR(syscon);
> +
> + /* configure the higher DMA address bits [35:32] */
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(syscon, reg_offset, DWCMSHC_ARWADDR,
> + DWCMSHC_ARWADDR_DEFAULT);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_deasserted(mmc_dev(host->mmc), NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(reset))
> + return dev_err_probe(mmc_dev(host->mmc), PTR_ERR(reset),
> + "Failed to get&deassert reset control\n");
> +
> + priv->cclk_tx = devm_clk_get(dev, "cclk_tx");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->cclk_tx))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->cclk_tx),
> + "Failed to get cclk_tx clock\n");
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->cclk_tx);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to enable cclk_tx clock\n");
> +
> + priv->cclk_tx_on = true;
> +
> + if (device_property_read_bool(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "mmc-ddr-1_8v") ||
> + device_property_read_bool(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "mmc-hs200-1_8v") ||
> + device_property_read_bool(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "mmc-hs400-1_8v"))
> + dwc_priv->flags |= FLAG_IO_FIXED_1V8;
> + else
> + dwc_priv->flags &= ~FLAG_IO_FIXED_1V8;
> +
> + dwc_priv->delay_line = 0x10;
Everywhere else delay_line value is a named define.
> + dwc_priv->priv = priv;
> +
> + if (dwc_priv->flags & FLAG_IO_FIXED_1V8) {
> + host->flags &= ~SDHCI_SIGNALING_330;
> + host->flags |= SDHCI_SIGNALING_180;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void dwcmshc_starfive_jhb100_deinit(struct dwcmshc_priv *dwc_priv)
> +{
> + struct jhb100_priv *priv = dwc_priv->priv;
> +
> + if (priv->cclk_tx_on)
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->cclk_tx);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dwcmshc_pltfm_data sdhci_dwcmshc_jhb100_pdata = {
> + .pdata = {
> + .ops = &starfive_jhb100_ops,
> + .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN,
> + .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN,
> + },
> + .init = dwcmshc_starfive_jhb100_init,
> + .deinit = dwcmshc_starfive_jhb100_deinit,
> +};
> +
> static const struct cqhci_host_ops dwcmshc_cqhci_ops = {
> .enable = dwcmshc_sdhci_cqe_enable,
> .disable = sdhci_cqe_disable,
> @@ -2377,6 +2525,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id sdhci_dwcmshc_dt_ids[] = {
> .compatible = "hpe,gsc-dwcmshc",
> .data = &sdhci_dwcmshc_hpe_gsc_pdata,
> },
> + {
> + .compatible = "starfive,jhb100-dwcmshc",
> + .data = &sdhci_dwcmshc_jhb100_pdata,
> + },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_dwcmshc_dt_ids);
> @@ -2503,6 +2655,8 @@ static int dwcmshc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> err_rpm:
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> + if (pltfm_data->deinit)
> + pltfm_data->deinit(priv);
> err_bus_clk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->bus_clk);
> err_clk:
> @@ -2527,6 +2681,7 @@ static void dwcmshc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> struct dwcmshc_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> + const struct dwcmshc_pltfm_data *pltfm_data = priv->dwcmshc_pdata;
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -2534,6 +2689,9 @@ static void dwcmshc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> sdhci_remove_host(host, 0);
>
> + if (pltfm_data->deinit)
> + pltfm_data->deinit(priv);
> +
> dwcmshc_disable_card_clk(host);
>
> clk_disable_unprepare(pltfm_host->clk);
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 9:29 [PATCH v1 0/2] Add StarFive JHB100 DWCMSHC controller support Changhuang Liang
2026-09-19 9:29 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: snps,dwcmshc-sdhci: Add starfive,jhb100-dwcmshc Changhuang Liang
2026-09-24 12:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-19 9:29 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Add support for StarFive JHB100 Changhuang Liang
2026-09-23 19:07 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2026-09-25 6:27 ` Changhuang Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e01a17f2-f736-4b12-9336-bb862dafda59@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com \
--cc=chen.wang@linux.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=inochiama@gmail.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sophgo@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®