* [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/amd_node: Fixes for virtualized systems
@ 2026-08-25 21:48 Jason Andryuk
2026-08-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on " Jason Andryuk
2026-08-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/amd_node: Remove smn_exclusive Jason Andryuk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Andryuk @ 2026-08-25 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar,
Mario Limonciello, Thomas Gleixner, x86, Yazen Ghannam
Cc: Jason Andryuk, linux-kernel, Penny Zheng
For v3, Add newline to warning. R-b Yazen.
For v2, swap the patch order.
On my test system, I see SMN accesses from:
amd_pmf_probe() - read
amd_pmc_probe() - read
acp_acp70_audio_probe() - write
Jason Andryuk (2):
x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on virtualized systems
x86/amd_node: Remove smn_exclusive
arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on virtualized systems
2026-08-25 21:48 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/amd_node: Fixes for virtualized systems Jason Andryuk
@ 2026-08-25 21:48 ` Jason Andryuk
2026-08-26 4:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/amd_node: Remove smn_exclusive Jason Andryuk
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Andryuk @ 2026-08-25 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar,
Mario Limonciello, Thomas Gleixner, x86, Yazen Ghannam
Cc: Jason Andryuk, linux-kernel, Penny Zheng, stable
On a virtualized system, the number of nodes does not have a
relationship to the number of roots. A Xen PVH dom0 can calculate
roots_per_node as 0, which crashes with a divide by zero in:
if (count++ % roots_per_node)
The issue is seen with Xen, but it could affect other systems.
Change roots_per_node == 0 to 1 to allow the system to boot. Print a
warning when this is performed for non-virtualized systems.
Fixes: 0a4b61d9c2e4 ("x86/amd_node: Fix AMD root device caching")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
---
v3:
Add newline to warning.
R-b: Yazen
v2:
Print as a warning instead of error
Use "!" instead of "== 0".
X86_FEATURE_XENPV is only for PV, but this is observed with a PVH dom0.
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
index 0be01725a2a4..408b9fd48349 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
@@ -287,6 +287,11 @@ static int __init amd_smn_init(void)
return -ENOMEM;
roots_per_node = num_roots / num_nodes;
+ if (!roots_per_node) {
+ if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+ pr_warn(FW_BUG "Error detecting roots per node.\n");
+ roots_per_node = 1;
+ }
count = 0;
node = 0;
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/amd_node: Remove smn_exclusive
2026-08-25 21:48 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/amd_node: Fixes for virtualized systems Jason Andryuk
2026-08-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on " Jason Andryuk
@ 2026-08-25 21:48 ` Jason Andryuk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Andryuk @ 2026-08-25 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar,
Mario Limonciello, Thomas Gleixner, x86, Yazen Ghannam
Cc: Jason Andryuk, linux-kernel, Penny Zheng, stable,
Mario Limonciello (AMD)
amd_smn_read/write() are exported functions around __amd_smn_rw(), so
they are always available even if amd_smn_init() fails. smn_exclusive
would prevent access to __amd_smn_rw(), but it is placed too late. If
amd_smn_init() failed, amd_roots is NULL and __amd_smn_rw() will fault
over it. Replace smn_exclusive with directly checking amd_roots to
avoid the NULL pointer dereference.
commit 83518453074d ("x86/amd_node: Add SMN offsets to exclusive region
access") added smn_exclusive which indicated the calls to
pci_request_config_region_exclusive() succeeded to prevent userspace
access.
commit 0a4b61d9c2e4 ("x86/amd_node: Fix AMD root device caching")
re-ordered initialization so pci_request_config_region_exclusive() is
called earlier and a failure exits amd_smn_init() before allocating
amd_roots. Setting smn_exclusive moved to the end of amd_smn_init(),
after amd_roots is allocated. smn_exclusive became redundant to
amd_roots and can be removed.
Add a comment stating how amd_roots replaces smn_exclusive's purpose.
Fixes: 77466b798d59 ("x86/amd_node: Remove dependency on AMD_NB")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
---
Fixes is the introduction of amd_roots, which could be a NULL deref.
v3:
No change
v2:
R-b Yazen and Mario
Add comment about amd_root taking smn_exclusive's purpose to indicate
userspace access is prevented.
Expand commit message
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
index 408b9fd48349..833e5eda5d91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ static struct pci_dev **amd_roots;
/* Protect the PCI config register pairs used for SMN. */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(smn_mutex);
-static bool smn_exclusive;
#define SMN_INDEX_OFFSET 0x60
#define SMN_DATA_OFFSET 0x64
@@ -91,11 +90,15 @@ static int __amd_smn_rw(u8 i_off, u8 d_off, u16 node, u32 address, u32 *value, b
if (node >= amd_num_nodes())
return err;
- root = amd_roots[node];
- if (!root)
+ /*
+ * non-NULL amd_roots indicates pci_request_config_region_exclusive()
+ * succeeded and userspace cannot access the registers.
+ */
+ if (!amd_roots)
return err;
- if (!smn_exclusive)
+ root = amd_roots[node];
+ if (!root)
return err;
guard(mutex)(&smn_mutex);
@@ -313,8 +316,6 @@ static int __init amd_smn_init(void)
debugfs_create_file("value", 0600, debugfs_dir, NULL, &smn_value_fops);
}
- smn_exclusive = true;
-
return 0;
}
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on virtualized systems
2026-08-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on " Jason Andryuk
@ 2026-08-26 4:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-26 12:15 ` Jason Andryuk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-08-26 4:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Andryuk
Cc: Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar, Mario Limonciello,
Thomas Gleixner, x86, Yazen Ghannam, linux-kernel, Penny Zheng,
stable
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 05:48:02PM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On a virtualized system, the number of nodes does not have a
> relationship to the number of roots. A Xen PVH dom0 can calculate
> roots_per_node as 0, which crashes with a divide by zero in:
>
> if (count++ % roots_per_node)
>
> The issue is seen with Xen, but it could affect other systems.
>
> Change roots_per_node == 0 to 1 to allow the system to boot. Print a
> warning when this is performed for non-virtualized systems.
>
> Fixes: 0a4b61d9c2e4 ("x86/amd_node: Fix AMD root device caching")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
> ---
> v3:
> Add newline to warning.
> R-b: Yazen
>
> v2:
> Print as a warning instead of error
> Use "!" instead of "== 0".
>
> X86_FEATURE_XENPV is only for PV, but this is observed with a PVH dom0.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
> index 0be01725a2a4..408b9fd48349 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
> @@ -287,6 +287,11 @@ static int __init amd_smn_init(void)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> roots_per_node = num_roots / num_nodes;
Hold on - the only way this is fixing something on Xen - and you say that
roots_per_node becomes 0 - which means that num_roots is 0.
But a couple of lines above, we have
if (!num_roots)
return -ENODEV;
So we would've exited already.
num_nodes can't be 0 because you'd explode even with this patch.
What am I missing?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on virtualized systems
2026-08-26 4:45 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2026-08-26 12:15 ` Jason Andryuk
2026-08-26 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Andryuk @ 2026-08-26 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar, Mario Limonciello,
Thomas Gleixner, x86, Yazen Ghannam, linux-kernel, Penny Zheng,
stable
On 2026-08-26 00:45, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 05:48:02PM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>> On a virtualized system, the number of nodes does not have a
>> relationship to the number of roots. A Xen PVH dom0 can calculate
>> roots_per_node as 0, which crashes with a divide by zero in:
>>
>> if (count++ % roots_per_node)
>>
>> The issue is seen with Xen, but it could affect other systems.
>>
>> Change roots_per_node == 0 to 1 to allow the system to boot. Print a
>> warning when this is performed for non-virtualized systems.
>>
>> Fixes: 0a4b61d9c2e4 ("x86/amd_node: Fix AMD root device caching")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> Add newline to warning.
>> R-b: Yazen
>>
>> v2:
>> Print as a warning instead of error
>> Use "!" instead of "== 0".
>>
>> X86_FEATURE_XENPV is only for PV, but this is observed with a PVH dom0.
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
>> index 0be01725a2a4..408b9fd48349 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
>> @@ -287,6 +287,11 @@ static int __init amd_smn_init(void)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> roots_per_node = num_roots / num_nodes;
>
> Hold on - the only way this is fixing something on Xen - and you say that
> roots_per_node becomes 0 - which means that num_roots is 0.
>
> But a couple of lines above, we have
>
> if (!num_roots)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> So we would've exited already.
>
> num_nodes can't be 0 because you'd explode even with this patch.
>
> What am I missing?
num_roots is 1, but num_nodes is 2. Integer division gives 0 for
roots_per_node.
Regards,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on virtualized systems
2026-08-26 12:15 ` Jason Andryuk
@ 2026-08-26 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-08-26 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Andryuk
Cc: Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar, Mario Limonciello,
Thomas Gleixner, x86, Yazen Ghannam, linux-kernel, Penny Zheng,
stable
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 08:15:49AM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> num_roots is 1, but num_nodes is 2. Integer division gives 0 for
> roots_per_node.
Aha, Xen has some topology knowledge and it manages to produce 2 nodes.
I'll add that to the commit message.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-26 15:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-25 21:48 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/amd_node: Fixes for virtualized systems Jason Andryuk
2026-08-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/amd_node: Avoid divide by zero on " Jason Andryuk
2026-08-26 4:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-26 12:15 ` Jason Andryuk
2026-08-26 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/amd_node: Remove smn_exclusive Jason Andryuk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®