mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 01:20:58 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e19db1f0-d6ab-de0d-c5a5-f574b0cb9814@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170223181116.GJ6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>



On 2/24/17 01:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> However, I have looked into reworking to not use the extra_regs, and I see
>> that the union in struct hw_perf_event currently contains various PMU-specific
>> structures (hardware, software, tracepoint, intel_cqm, itrace, amd_power,
>> and breakpoint).
>>
>> For amd_iommu PMU, we need additional registers for holding amd_iommu-specific
>> parameters. So, it seems that we can just introduce amd_iommu-specific struct
>> instead of re-using the existing structure for hardware events.
>>
>> I'm planning to add the following structure in the same union:
>>
>>     union {
>>         ......
>>                 struct { /* amd_iommu */
>>                         u8      iommu_csource;
>>                         u8      iommu_bank;
>>                         u8      iommu_cntr;
>>                         u16     iommu_devid;
>>                         u16     iommu_devid_msk;
>>                         u16     iommu_domid;
>>                         u16     iommu_domid_msk;
>>                         u32     iommu_pasid;
>>                         u32     iommu_pasid_msk;
>>                 };
>>     };
>>
>> Please let me know what you think, of if I am still missing your points.
> Yes, adding a struct to that union is fine and clarifies things. And
> just because I'm weird like that, there's a u8 hole after iommu_cntr.

Ok, I'll update this in V10 that I'll be sending out this week.

Thanks,
Suravee

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-16  7:23 [PATCH v8 0/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] perf/amd/iommu: Declare pr_fmt and remove unnecessary pr_debug Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] perf/amd/iommu: Clean up perf_iommu_enable_event Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-18 18:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] perf/amd/iommu: Misc fix up perf_iommu_read Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-19 10:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 12:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-07  4:50     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] iommu/amd: Introduce amd_iommu_get_num_iommus() Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-19 18:41   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] perf/amd/iommu: Modify functions to query max banks and counters Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-22 19:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] perf/amd/iommu: Modify amd_iommu_pc_get_set_reg_val() API to allow specifying IOMMU index Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-22 19:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] perf/amd/iommu: Check return value when set and get counter value Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-22 19:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 12:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] perf/amd/iommu: Fix sysfs perf attribute groups Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-22 19:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-16  7:23 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-22 19:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-07  1:42     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-01-25  9:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-25  9:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-07  1:58       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-02-07  1:57     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-02-14 12:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-23 17:43         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-02-23 18:11           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-23 18:20             ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2017-01-17 15:36 ` [PATCH v8 0/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e19db1f0-d6ab-de0d-c5a5-f574b0cb9814@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®