mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Nitin Yadav <n-yadav@ti.com>, Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-mcu: Add mcu_secproxy
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 22:37:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e25936b9-d85c-dfe8-0eb1-07b51fdfff1e@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530165900.47502-5-nm@ti.com>

Hi Nishanth

On 5/30/2023 10:28 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> MCU domain has it's own secure proxy for communicating with ROM and
> for R5 micro controller firmware operations. This is in addition to
> the one in the main domain NAVSS subsystem that is used for general
> purpose communication.
>
> Describe the node for use with bootloaders and firmware that require
> this communication path which uses interrupts to corresponding micro
> controller interrupt controller. Mark the node as disabled since this
> instance does not have interrupts routed to the main processor by
> default for a complete description of the node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> ---
> New patch
>
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> index 674e695ef844..dff23b258240 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -209,6 +209,21 @@ mcu_udmap: dma-controller@285c0000 {
>   		};
>   	};
>   
> +	secure_proxy_mcu: mailbox@2a480000 {
I think, we should start name as  mailbox@2a380000
> +		compatible = "ti,am654-secure-proxy";
> +		#mbox-cells = <1>;
> +		reg-names = "target_data", "rt", "scfg";
> +		reg = <0x0 0x2a480000 0x0 0x80000>,
> +		      <0x0 0x2a380000 0x0 0x80000>,
> +		      <0x0 0x2a400000 0x0 0x80000>;

I think, we should have increasing order for reg. Unless there is some 
strong reason to keep in this way.

> +		/*
> +		 * Marked Disabled:
> +		 * Node is incomplete as it is meant for bootloaders and
> +		 * firmware on non-MPU processors
> +		 */
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
>   	mcu_cpsw: ethernet@46000000 {
>   		compatible = "ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss";
>   		#address-cells = <2>;

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-31 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-30 16:58 [PATCH 0/7] arm64: dts: ti: Add additional secproxy instances Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Add sa3_secproxy Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-main: " Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu: Add mcu_secproxy Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-mcu: " Nishanth Menon
2023-05-31 17:07   ` Kumar, Udit [this message]
2023-05-31 17:39     ` Nishanth Menon
2023-06-06 13:08       ` Kumar, Udit
2023-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-mcu: " Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup: Add sa3_secproxy and mcu_sec_proxy Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-mcu-wakeup: " Nishanth Menon
2023-06-15 13:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] arm64: dts: ti: Add additional secproxy instances Vignesh Raghavendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e25936b9-d85c-dfe8-0eb1-07b51fdfff1e@ti.com \
    --to=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=n-yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®