From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: "joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Fix IOMMU page flush when detach all devices from a domain
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:53:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e27055c1-89b0-e804-b99c-c94965de5344@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190122104454.nke2knuyqiswfh5w@8bytes.org>
Joerg,
On 1/22/19 5:44 PM, joro@8bytes.org wrote:
> Hi Suravee,
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:44:36AM +0000, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
>> Then, in __domain_flush_pages, we issue command when the dev_iommu[] >= 0.
>> This should preserve previous behavior, and only add flushing condition to
>> the specific IOMMU in detached state. Please let me know what you think.
>
> I think the whole point why VFIO is detaching all devices first and then
> goes into unmapping pages is that there are no flushes needed anymore
> when devices are detached.
>
> But when we follow your proposal we would still do IOTLB flushes even
> when no devices are attached anymore. So I'd like to avoid this, given
> the implications on unmapping performance. We should just flush the
> IOMMU TLB at detach time and be done with it.
>
> Makes sense?
>
> Regards,
>
> Joerg
>
Thanks for the detail. Alright then, let's just go with the version you
sent on 1/16/19. Do you want me to resend V3 with that changes, or
would you be taking care of that?
Thanks,
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-22 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-16 4:16 Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-01-16 13:26 ` joro
2019-01-16 14:08 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-01-16 17:08 ` joro
2019-01-17 8:44 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-01-17 11:48 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-01-22 10:44 ` joro
2019-01-22 15:53 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee [this message]
2019-01-23 7:56 ` joro
2019-01-24 3:25 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-01-24 8:04 ` joro
2019-01-16 14:40 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-01-16 17:09 ` joro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e27055c1-89b0-e804-b99c-c94965de5344@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome