From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pauld@redhat.com, parth@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:50:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e28bb567-dade-877b-f338-ce87e28cc02d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200218153801.GF3420@suse.de>
On 18/02/2020 15:38, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>
>> Could we reuse group_type instead? The definitions are the same modulo
>> s/group/node/.
>>
>
> I kept the naming because there is the remote possibility that NUMA
> balancing will deviate in some fashion. Right now, it's harmless.
>
Since it's just a subset ATM I'd go for the reuse and change that later if
shown a split is required, but fair enough.
> I didn't merge that part of the first version of my series. I was
> waiting to see how the implementation for allowing a small degree of
> imbalance looks like. If it's entirely confined in adjust_numa_balance
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Apologies if that's a newbie question, but I'm not familiar with that one.
Would that be added in your reconciliation series? I've only had a brief
look at it yet (it's next on the chopping block).
> then I'll create the common helper at the same time. For now, I left the
> possibility open that numa_classify would use something different than
> group_is_overloaded or group_has_capacity even if I find that hard to
> imagine at the moment.
>
>> What I'm naively thinking here is that we could have either move the whole
>> thing to just sg_lb_stats (AFAICT the fields of numa_stats are a subset of it),
>> or if we really care about the stack we could tweak the ordering to ensure
>> we can cast one into the other (not too enticed by that one though).
>>
>
> Yikes, no I'd rather not do that. Basically all I did before was create
> a common helper like __lb_has_capacity that only took basic types as
> parameters. group_has_capacity and numa_has_capacity were simple wrappers
> that read the correct fields from their respective stats structures.
>
That's more sensible indeed. It'd definitely be nice to actually reconcile
the two balancers with these common helpers, though I guess it doesn't
*have* to happen with this very patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 15:27 [PATCH v2 0/5] remove runnable_load_avg and improve group_classify Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] sched/fair: Reorder enqueue/dequeue_task_fair path Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 12:37 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-18 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-18 14:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-19 11:07 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-19 16:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-20 13:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
[not found] ` <20200222152541.GA11669@geo.homenetwork>
2020-02-26 16:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 12:37 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-18 13:50 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-18 14:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 14:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-18 14:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 15:33 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 15:38 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-18 16:50 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-02-18 17:41 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-18 17:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 16:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] sched/pelt: Remove unused runnable load average Vincent Guittot
2020-02-21 9:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-21 11:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sched/pelt: Add a new runnable average signal Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 14:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-18 15:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 16:30 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 21:19 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-19 9:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-19 9:08 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-19 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 " Vincent Guittot
2020-02-19 14:02 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-19 20:10 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-20 14:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-20 16:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-21 8:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-24 15:57 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-21 9:04 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-21 9:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-21 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-21 13:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-20 15:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-21 9:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-21 11:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] sched/fair: Take into account runnable_avg to classify group Vincent Guittot
2020-02-15 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] remove runnable_load_avg and improve group_classify Mel Gorman
2020-02-21 9:58 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e28bb567-dade-877b-f338-ce87e28cc02d@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®