mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.31.1] include/linux/kmemcheck.h: fix a sparse warning
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:41:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2e108260910012341v5eab14c5o29da95ec52e75183@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909261428.06802.bart.vanassche@gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Bart Van Assche
<bart.vanassche@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Checking a 2.6.31.1 kernel configured with allyesconfig/allmodconfig
> with sparse (make C=2) triggers a sparse warning on code that uses the
> kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield() macro. An example of such a warning:
>
> include/net/inet_sock.h:208:17: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>
> --- linux-2.6.31.1/include/linux/kmemcheck-orig.h       2009-09-26 13:53:44.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.31.1/include/linux/kmemcheck.h    2009-09-26 13:53:56.000000000 +0200
> @@ -137,13 +137,13 @@ static inline void kmemcheck_mark_initia
>        int name##_end[0];
>
>  #define kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(ptr, name)                         \
> -       do if (ptr) {                                                   \
> +       do { if (ptr) {                                                 \
>                int _n = (long) &((ptr)->name##_end)                    \
>                        - (long) &((ptr)->name##_begin);                \
>                BUILD_BUG_ON(_n < 0);                                   \
>                                                                        \
>                kmemcheck_mark_initialized(&((ptr)->name##_begin), _n); \
> -       } while (0)
> +       } } while (0)
>
>  #define kmemcheck_annotate_variable(var)                               \
>        do {                                                            \

(ping)

Did anyone already have the time to review the patch above ?

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-02  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-26 12:28 Bart Van Assche
2009-10-02  6:41 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2009-10-02  7:51   ` Vegard Nossum
2009-10-14  7:06     ` Bart Van Assche
2009-10-14 11:26       ` Vegard Nossum
2009-10-14 11:52         ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2e108260910012341v5eab14c5o29da95ec52e75183@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vegardno@ifi.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®