linux-next: Tree for Oct 7

linux-next: Tree for Oct 7

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1780 bytes --]

Hi all,

Note that I will be travelling to LPC from 2nd-9th October, as a
result -next releases will be at best spotty during that time.

Changes since 20261006:

The net-next tree acquired a conflict with the net tree.

Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 13708
 13813 files changed, 896719 insertions(+), 335384 deletions(-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have created today's linux-next tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
(patches at https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ).  If you
are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
old one.  You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
master.

You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source.  There is also the merge.log file in the Next
directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built with a defconfig
for arm64, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a multi_v7_defconfig for arm,
an arm64 build of various kselftests, a KUnit build and run on arm64,
and a native build of tools/perf.  After the final fixups (if any), I do
an x86_64 modules_install followed by builds for x86_64 allnoconfig,
arm64 allyesconfig, powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit),
ppc44x_defconfig and pseries_le_defconfig and i386, s390, sparc and
sparc64 defconfig and htmldocs.

Below is a summary of the state of the merge.

I am currently merging 433 trees (counting Linus' and 135 trees of bug
fix patches pending for the current release).

Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .

Thanks to Paul Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 7 (arch/m68k/coldfire/nettel.c)

[Randy Dunlap]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 550 bytes --]



On 10/7/26 6:41 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Note that I will be travelling to LPC from 2nd-9th October, as a
> result -next releases will be at best spotty during that time.
> 
> Changes since 20261006:

CONFIG_COLDFIRE=y
CONFIG_M5206e=y
CONFIG_NETtel=y

../arch/m68k/coldfire/nettel.c: In function 'nettel_smc91x_init':
../arch/m68k/coldfire/nettel.c:126:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mcf_setppdata' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  126 |         mcf_setppdata(0, 0x0080);


Full randconfig file is attached.

-- 
~Randy

[-- Attachment #2: config-r1643.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30715 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 7 (arch/m68k/coldfire/nettel.c)

[Greg Ungerer]

On 8/10/26 08:43, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/7/26 6:41 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Note that I will be travelling to LPC from 2nd-9th October, as a
>> result -next releases will be at best spotty during that time.
>>
>> Changes since 20261006:
> 
> CONFIG_COLDFIRE=y
> CONFIG_M5206e=y
> CONFIG_NETtel=y
> 
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/nettel.c: In function 'nettel_smc91x_init':
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/nettel.c:126:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mcf_setppdata' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>    126 |         mcf_setppdata(0, 0x0080);
> 
> 
> Full randconfig file is attached.

Thanks for letting me know Randy.
FWIW this is not a regression in linux-next, this looks to have been 
broken for a while.

I will issue a fix in the coming days.

Regards
Greg