From: Lauro Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: lwang@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:19:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e450792c-2f6b-9273-60f6-e48bd2af047d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170424142739.nlawad5ozakf3mjn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 04/24/2017 11:27 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 04:19:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:03:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> Also, would it not make sense to re-order patch 2 to come after this,
>>> such that we _do_ have the group_mask available and don't have to jump
>>> through hoops in order to link up the sgc? Afaict we don't actually use
>>> the sgc until the above (reverse) loop computing the CPU capacities.
>> That is, if I force 4 on without 2, then doesn't something like the
>> below also do the right thing? (without duplicating part of the magic
>> already contained in build_group_mask)
Yes, it has the same result. I duplicated the build_group_mask magic to
avoid building the complete mask for all instances of a group.
Currently, the mask is built just once per group.
>>
>> ---
>> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
>> @@ -498,13 +498,16 @@ enum s_alloc {
>> *
>> * This function can only be used when all the groups are already built.
>> */
>> -static void build_group_mask(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *sg)
>> +static void
>> +build_group_mask(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *sg, struct cpumask *mask)
>> {
>> const struct cpumask *sg_span = sched_group_cpus(sg);
>> struct sd_data *sdd = sd->private;
>> struct sched_domain *sibling;
>> int i;
>>
>> + cpumask_clear(mask);
>> +
>> for_each_cpu(i, sg_span) {
>> sibling = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, i);
>>
>> @@ -514,7 +517,7 @@ static void build_group_mask(struct sche
>> if (!cpumask_equal(sg_span, sched_group_cpus(sibling->groups)))
>> continue;
>>
>> - cpumask_set_cpu(i, sched_group_mask(sg));
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(i, mask);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -549,14 +552,19 @@ build_group_from_child_sched_domain(stru
>> }
>>
>> static void init_overlap_sched_group(struct sched_domain *sd,
>> - struct sched_group *sg, int cpu)
>> + struct sched_group *sg)
>> {
>> + struct cpumask *mask = sched_domains_tmpmask;
>> struct sd_data *sdd = sd->private;
>> struct cpumask *sg_span;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + build_group_mask(sd, sg, mask);
>> + cpu = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_mask(sg), mask); /* balance cpu */
> s/group_mask/group_span/
>
>>
>> sg->sgc = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgc, cpu);
>> if (atomic_inc_return(&sg->sgc->ref) == 1)
>> - build_group_mask(sd, sg);
>> + cpumask_copy(sched_group_mask(sg), mask);
>>
>> /*
>> * Initialize sgc->capacity such that even if we mess up the
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 19:51 [PATCH 0/4] sched/topology: fix overlap group capacity and balance cpu Lauro Ramos Venancio
2017-04-20 19:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/topology: optimize build_group_mask() Lauro Ramos Venancio
2017-05-15 9:06 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/topology: Optimize build_group_mask() tip-bot for Lauro Ramos Venancio
2017-04-20 19:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/topology: all instances of a sched group must use the same sched_group_capacity Lauro Ramos Venancio
2017-04-20 19:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/topology: move comment about asymmetric node setups Lauro Ramos Venancio
2017-04-21 16:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-15 9:06 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/topology: Move " tip-bot for Lauro Ramos Venancio
2017-04-20 19:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Lauro Ramos Venancio
2017-04-24 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24 15:19 ` Lauro Venancio [this message]
2017-04-24 22:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24 15:11 ` Lauro Venancio
2017-04-24 22:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 14:33 ` Lauro Venancio
2017-04-25 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 15:56 ` Lauro Venancio
2017-04-25 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-26 16:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched/topology: fix overlap group capacity and balance cpu Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-26 17:59 ` Lauro Venancio
2017-04-26 22:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-28 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e450792c-2f6b-9273-60f6-e48bd2af047d@redhat.com \
--to=lvenanci@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwang@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®