mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the highest frequency issue which limit performance
@ 2024-05-07 17:48 Mario Limonciello
  2024-05-07 19:38 ` Mario Limonciello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2024-05-07 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gautham.shenoy
  Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, regressions, rafael, Perry Yuan,
	Mario Limonciello

From: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>

To address the performance drop issue, an optimization has been
implemented. The incorrect highest performance value previously set by the
low-level power firmware for AMD CPUs with Family ID 0x19 and Model ID
ranging from 0x70 to 0x7F series has been identified as the cause.

To resolve this, a check has been implemented to accurately determine the
CPU family and model ID. The correct highest performance value is now set
and the performance drop caused by the incorrect highest performance value
are eliminated.

Before the fix, the highest frequency was set to 4200MHz, now it is set
to 4971MHz which is correct.

CPU NODE SOCKET CORE L1d:L1i:L2:L3 ONLINE    MAXMHZ   MINMHZ       MHZ
  0    0      0    0 0:0:0:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000
  1    0      0    0 0:0:0:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000
  2    0      0    1 1:1:1:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000 4865.8140
  3    0      0    1 1:1:1:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000

Fixes: f3a052391822 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Enable amd-pstate preferred core support")
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218759
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
This comes from patch 10 originally by Perry in [1].  As there is a regression in 6.9
it's pulled out separately from the rest of the series.
This should go to 6.9 final if possible; otherwise 6.10-rc1 and CC to stable
at that time.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/cover.1715065568.git.perry.yuan@amd.com/T/#t.

 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
index fbe57d356ee4..4859902eaf1a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@
 
 #define AMD_PSTATE_TRANSITION_LATENCY	20000
 #define AMD_PSTATE_TRANSITION_DELAY	1000
-#define AMD_PSTATE_PREFCORE_THRESHOLD	166
+#define CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE	196
+#define CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_DEFAULT	166
 
 /*
  * TODO: We need more time to fine tune processors with shared memory solution
@@ -264,6 +265,21 @@ static inline int amd_pstate_enable(bool enable)
 	return static_call(amd_pstate_enable)(enable);
 }
 
+static u32 amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
+{
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+
+	/*
+	 * For AMD CPUs with Family ID 19H and Model ID range 0x70 to 0x7f,
+	 * the highest performance level is set to 196.
+	 * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218759
+	 */
+	if (c->x86 == 0x19 && (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model <= 0x7f))
+		return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;
+
+	return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_DEFAULT;
+}
+
 static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
 {
 	u64 cap1;
@@ -280,7 +296,7 @@ static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
 	 * the default max perf.
 	 */
 	if (cpudata->hw_prefcore)
-		highest_perf = AMD_PSTATE_PREFCORE_THRESHOLD;
+		highest_perf = amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(cpudata);
 	else
 		highest_perf = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1);
 
@@ -304,7 +320,7 @@ static int cppc_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (cpudata->hw_prefcore)
-		highest_perf = AMD_PSTATE_PREFCORE_THRESHOLD;
+		highest_perf = amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(cpudata);
 	else
 		highest_perf = cppc_perf.highest_perf;
 
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the highest frequency issue which limit performance
@ 2024-05-08  5:47 Perry Yuan
  2024-05-08 11:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2024-05-18 22:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Perry Yuan @ 2024-05-08  5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rafael.j.wysocki, Mario.Limonciello, viresh.kumar, Ray.Huang,
	gautham.shenoy, Borislav.Petkov
  Cc: Alexander.Deucher, Xinmei.Huang, Xiaojian.Du, Li.Meng, linux-pm,
	linux-kernel

To address the performance drop issue, an optimization has been
implemented. The incorrect highest performance value previously set by the
low-level power firmware for AMD CPUs with Family ID 0x19 and Model ID
ranging from 0x70 to 0x7F series has been identified as the cause.

To resolve this, a check has been implemented to accurately determine the
CPU family and model ID. The correct highest performance value is now set
and the performance drop caused by the incorrect highest performance value
are eliminated.

Before the fix, the highest frequency was set to 4200MHz, now it is set
to 4971MHz which is correct.

CPU NODE SOCKET CORE L1d:L1i:L2:L3 ONLINE    MAXMHZ   MINMHZ       MHZ
  0    0      0    0 0:0:0:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000
  1    0      0    0 0:0:0:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000
  2    0      0    1 1:1:1:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000 4865.8140
  3    0      0    1 1:1:1:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000

v1->v2:
 * add test by flag from Gaha Bana

Fixes: f3a052391822 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Enable amd-pstate preferred core support")
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218759
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Tested-by: Gaha Bana <gahabana@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
index 2db095867d03..6a342b0c0140 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@
 
 #define AMD_PSTATE_TRANSITION_LATENCY	20000
 #define AMD_PSTATE_TRANSITION_DELAY	1000
-#define AMD_PSTATE_PREFCORE_THRESHOLD	166
+#define CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE	196
+#define CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_DEFAULT	166
 
 /*
  * TODO: We need more time to fine tune processors with shared memory solution
@@ -326,6 +327,21 @@ static inline int amd_pstate_enable(bool enable)
 	return static_call(amd_pstate_enable)(enable);
 }
 
+static u32 amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
+{
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+
+	/*
+	 * For AMD CPUs with Family ID 19H and Model ID range 0x70 to 0x7f,
+	 * the highest performance level is set to 196.
+	 * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218759
+	 */
+	if (c->x86 == 0x19 && (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model <= 0x7f))
+		return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;
+
+	return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_DEFAULT;
+}
+
 static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
 {
 	u64 cap1;
@@ -342,7 +358,7 @@ static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
 	 * the default max perf.
 	 */
 	if (cpudata->hw_prefcore)
-		highest_perf = AMD_PSTATE_PREFCORE_THRESHOLD;
+		highest_perf = amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(cpudata);
 	else
 		highest_perf = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1);
 
@@ -366,7 +382,7 @@ static int cppc_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (cpudata->hw_prefcore)
-		highest_perf = AMD_PSTATE_PREFCORE_THRESHOLD;
+		highest_perf = amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(cpudata);
 	else
 		highest_perf = cppc_perf.highest_perf;
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-19  5:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-07 17:48 [PATCH] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the highest frequency issue which limit performance Mario Limonciello
2024-05-07 19:38 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-08  5:47 Perry Yuan
2024-05-08 11:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-05-08 12:19   ` Yuan, Perry
2024-05-18 22:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-19  5:32   ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®