From: Kyle Hendry <khendry@reliablecontrols.com>
To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org
Cc: "Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Lad Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: pcs: rzn1-miic: Validate dtb configuration values
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:13:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6315e1d-5a13-40be-a2e3-82695fbaecb7@reliablecontrols.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179063075707.31693.10158252953196019880@kernel.org>
On 28-Sep-26 14:25, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
>
> - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
> (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
> the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
>
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
>
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.
On the RZ/N1D I can trigger a KASAN slab-out-of-bounds error by defining
miic 6 in the dts. I can also trigger a KASAN global-out-of-bounds error
by configuring a miic input with a value outside the defined range.
I don't have a RZ/T2H to test with, but after investigating the sashiko
reviews [1], [2] I agree that there is still a bug when checking for
miic_port_max. If the value in rzt2h_miic_of_data is correct and being
used as intended I can resubmit the patch using conf_conv_count instead.
If the fixes tags were added inappropriately, I can remove them and
resubmit this series.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/178955899323.22033.2372714834297554596@kernel.org/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/178955899447.22033.5754427139793967412@kernel.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 21:19 Kyle Hendry via B4 Relay
2026-09-28 21:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: pcs: rzn1-miic: Fix port numbering on RZ/T2H Kyle Hendry via B4 Relay
2026-09-28 21:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: pcs: rzn1-miic: Fix miic register initialization loop Kyle Hendry via B4 Relay
2026-09-28 21:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: pcs: rzn1-miic: Validate dtb configuration values Kyle Hendry via B4 Relay
2026-09-28 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] " netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-09-29 18:13 ` Kyle Hendry [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6315e1d-5a13-40be-a2e3-82695fbaecb7@reliablecontrols.com \
--to=khendry@reliablecontrols.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®