From: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:25:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e73bdc36-5fb1-4ea8-9f96-608eb1a9b6af@bell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e302d8f-4e94-4278-b556-b8fc54956efb@roeck-us.net>
On 2024-02-15 12:06 p.m., Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/15/24 08:51, John David Anglin wrote:
>> On 2024-02-15 10:44 a.m., Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 2/15/24 02:27, David Laight wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>> It would be worthwhile tracking this down since there are
>>>>> lots of unaligned data accesses (8-byte accesses on 4-byte aligned addresses)
>>>>> when running the kernel in 64-bit mode.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm....
>>>> For performance reasons you really don't want any of them.
>>>> The misaligned 64bit fields need an __attribute((aligned(4)) marker.
>>>>
>>>> If the checksum code can do them it really needs to detect
>>>> and handle the misalignment.
>>>>
>>>> The misaligned trap handler probably ought to contain a
>>>> warn_on_once() to dump stack on the first such error.
>>>> They can then be fixed one at a time.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unaligned LDD at unwind_once+0x4a8/0x5e0
>>>
>>> Decoded:
>>>
>>> Unaligned LDD at unwind_once (arch/parisc/kernel/unwind.c:212 arch/parisc/kernel/unwind.c:243 arch/parisc/kernel/unwind.c:371
>>> arch/parisc/kernel/unwind.c:445)
>>>
>>> Source:
>>>
>>> static bool pc_is_kernel_fn(unsigned long pc, void *fn)
>>> {
>>> return (unsigned long)dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(fn) == pc;
>> This looks wrong to me. Function descriptors should always be 8-byte aligned. I think this
>> routine should return false if fn isn't 8-byte aligned.
>
> Below you state "Code entry points only need 4-byte alignment."
>
> I think that contradicts each other. Also, the calling code is,
> for example,
> pc_is_kernel_fn(pc, syscall_exit)
>
> I fail to see how this can be consolidated if it is ok
> that syscall_exit is 4-byte aligned but, at the same time,
> must be 8-byte aligned to be considered to be a kernel function.
In the above call, syscall_exit is treated as a function pointer. It points to an 8-byte aligned
function descriptor. The descriptor holds the actual address of the function. It only needs
4-byte alignment.
Descriptors need 8-byte alignment for efficiency on 64-bit parisc. The pc and gp are accessed
using ldd instructions.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-15 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 21:41 [PATCH v8 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-14 21:41 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] lib: checksum: Fix type casting in checksum kunits Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-14 21:41 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-14 23:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 1:30 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-15 1:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 3:00 ` John David Anglin
2024-02-15 3:35 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-15 4:11 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-15 8:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 15:36 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-15 16:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 16:51 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-15 17:13 ` John David Anglin
2024-02-15 17:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 15:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-16 5:54 ` Helge Deller
2024-02-16 5:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-16 7:31 ` Helge Deller
2024-02-16 6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-16 6:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-16 6:13 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-16 12:05 ` Helge Deller
2024-02-16 18:22 ` John David Anglin
2024-02-15 10:27 ` David Laight
2024-02-15 15:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 16:51 ` John David Anglin
2024-02-15 17:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 17:25 ` John David Anglin [this message]
2024-02-15 18:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 18:56 ` John David Anglin
2024-02-15 21:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 21:08 ` John David Anglin
2024-02-15 18:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 19:41 ` David Laight
2024-02-15 19:42 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-16 5:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-15 1:24 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e73bdc36-5fb1-4ea8-9f96-608eb1a9b6af@bell.net \
--to=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®