From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] hisi_sas: Misc bugfixes and an optimisation patch
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:47:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e771c366-2824-8774-4c90-9906992ee813@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq18t354532.fsf@oracle.com>
On 11/10/2018 02:58, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> John,
>
Hi Martin,
>> However it does block us in future from enabling SCSI MQ in the driver.
>
> We're going to remove the legacy I/O path so I'm not particularly keen
> on merging something that's going in the opposite direction.
What I really meant was that we cannot expose multiple queues to upper
layer, and nothing related to legacy IO path.
>
>> This is because the IPTT index must be a unique value per HBA. However,
>> if we switched to SCSI MQ, the block layer tag becomes unique per queue,
>> and not per HBA.
>
> That doesn't sound right.
>
Again, my wording my probably was not accurate. I meant that rq tag is
not unqiue across all hw queues.
As I mentioned in the thread that spawned from this, we actually can't
expose multiple hw queues at the moment. And, if we did, we find a
performance drop due to having to go back to manage this IPTT internally.
So how to handle? We're going to continue to work towards exposing
multiple queues to upper layer, but for the moment I think patch 6/7 is
a good change.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-24 15:06 John Garry
2018-09-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi: hisi_sas: Feed back linkrate(max/min) when re-attached John Garry
2018-09-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] scsi: hisi_sas: Move evaluation of hisi_hba in hisi_sas_task_prep() John Garry
2018-09-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi: hisi_sas: Fix the race between IO completion and timeout for SMP/internal IO John Garry
2018-09-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi: hisi_sas: Free slot later in slot_complete_vx_hw() John Garry
2018-09-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: hisi_sas: unmask interrupts ent72 and ent74 John Garry
2018-09-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] scsi: hisi_sas: Use block layer tag instead for IPTT John Garry
2018-09-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] scsi: hisi_sas: Update v3 hw AIP_LIMIT and CFG_AGING_TIME register values John Garry
2018-10-04 15:30 ` [PATCH 0/7] hisi_sas: Misc bugfixes and an optimisation patch John Garry
2018-10-11 1:58 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-11 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 9:59 ` John Garry
2018-10-11 10:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:12 ` John Garry
2018-10-11 13:32 ` Ming Lei
2018-10-11 14:07 ` John Garry
2018-10-11 23:36 ` Ming Lei
2018-10-12 9:02 ` John Garry
2018-10-12 13:30 ` Ming Lei
2018-10-12 10:47 ` John Garry [this message]
2018-10-16 4:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16 8:28 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e771c366-2824-8774-4c90-9906992ee813@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®