mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Different scheduler behavior between 2.4 and 2.6
@ 2007-05-10  5:46 Quan Sun
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Quan Sun @ 2007-05-10  5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi,
  Recently I met a problem on different scheduler behavior between
2.4.22 and 2.6.18.8.
  The application works as a proxy, it listen on an interface,
connect through another interface. This application works on a box
with two Xeon cpu, each of them is hyper-threading.
  On 2.4.22, CPU0 serve interrupts, the application works on other
three CPUs.
  But on 2.6.18.8, if I turn on 'noirqbalance' kernel parameter, and no
irqbalance  process, the application will stuck to CPU0 as well as interrupts
after several seconds' working. Then there will be a 0% idle cpu, and
three 100%idle CPUs.

 /proc/interrupt shows all eths's interrupts are working at CPU0.

 It seems that scheduler ignores the working load of interrupts.

  My question is, is there a way to tune 2.6 kernel working as 2.4?
Just one cpu for interrupts, other three cpu for normal work.

-- 
Quan Sun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-05-10  5:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-10  5:46 Different scheduler behavior between 2.4 and 2.6 Quan Sun

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®